Toby Johnson schrieb:
Since it seems that the time I can put in with this project will
remain sporadic for the foreseeable future, I would like to alter the
criteria I'm using for 0.10-blocker tickets. My proposal is to hold up
the 0.10 release only for issues which cause an invalid dumpfile to be
created (and by "invalid" I mean one which causes "svnadmin load" to
fail).
This is ok with me. I think, that the next version is in the queue
already, since my PinBranch comes up very nicely. Yesterday evening it
failed on my broken archive file, but the logic up to this point is
tested, and I don't expect to many problems from there. But still this
branch could need more testing. I have to look into your sanity checker.
I merged the changes, but since I heavily rely on the physical file
name, I think I need a few adjustments.
The final issue for me is the complete label support. But this is
sheduled for 0.11 or 0.12.
I think also, that we are ready for a 0.10 beta.
Dirk
_______________________________________________
vss2svn-users mailing list
Project homepage: http://www.pumacode.org/projects/vss2svn/
Subscribe/Unsubscribe/Admin:
http://lists.pumacode.org/mailman/listinfo/vss2svn-users-lists.pumacode.org
