Toby Johnson wrote:
Since it seems that the time I can put in with this project will
remain sporadic for the foreseeable future, I would like to alter the
criteria I'm using for 0.10-blocker tickets. My proposal is to hold up
the 0.10 release only for issues which cause an invalid dumpfile to be
created (and by "invalid" I mean one which causes "svnadmin load" to
fail).
My initial analysis of currently open issues is that none of them should
currently block 0.10. Dirk, the remaining three tickets under version
0.10 are all with ssphys, and I believe at least #23 and #15 are already
fixed; can you take a look at them?
<http://www.pumacode.org/projects/vss2svn/report/2>
My plan is to create a branch tonight for 0.10, which will be the basis
of all future 0.10 releases, so that further work can continue on the
trunk. I'll also hopefully tag and release 0.10-beta, as well as
generate a release zipfile with vss2svn.exe and ssphys.exe.
I'm also going to submit a patch to the Subversion devs asking that they
change the link on <http://subversion.tigris.org/links.html> to point to
the new site.
_______________________________________________
vss2svn-users mailing list
Project homepage:
http://www.pumacode.org/projects/vss2svn/
Subscribe/Unsubscribe/Admin:
http://lists.pumacode.org/mailman/listinfo/vss2svn-users-lists.pumacode.org
