Toby: > Hello James and Kenneth, sorry for the delay in responding; I was out of > town last week. The .txt extension was simply so I could easily open it > up in my text editor but I agree it's probably not the best. How about > we just remove the extension altogether? Any reason to have one?
Sounds perfectly reasonable to me. Again, I should have noticed sooner, but a change would prevent future people from making the same mistake. > To answer your previous question James, no, svnadmin does not require > the MD5 hashes to be present (I don't have the link handy but the specs > for the dumpfile format listed it as optional). I guess it's a moot > point right now anyway, since you determined the problem already... Thanks. At the time I was desperately seeking for some difference between a dump file I knew to work and the one that I had from vss2svn to explain why it wasn't working. -James _______________________________________________ vss2svn-users mailing list Project homepage: http://www.pumacode.org/projects/vss2svn/ Subscribe/Unsubscribe/Admin: http://lists.pumacode.org/mailman/listinfo/vss2svn-users-lists.pumacode.org Mailing list web interface (with searchable archives): http://dir.gmane.org/gmane.comp.version-control.subversion.vss2svn.user
