--On Friday, August 18, 2006 11:29 AM +0200 Werner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Characters in the range 0x80-0xFF are quite common even in filenames.
Most comments were created with codepage 1252 altough I've seen a few
that use codepage 932 probably. I would not expect that these are
converted correctly. But the 0x15 character that made LOADVSSNAMES fail
did not come from a filename or comment. It's probably produced by a bug
in the name scrambling algorithm. I don't think they intended to put a
0x15 character into a 8.3 filename. What are these used for anyway?
names.dat allows the DB files to be 8.3 and still reference long names.
I guess we'll need to add some code to scrub sub-32 code points other than
known white space characters.
_______________________________________________
vss2svn-users mailing list
Project homepage:
http://www.pumacode.org/projects/vss2svn/
Subscribe/Unsubscribe/Admin:
http://lists.pumacode.org/mailman/listinfo/vss2svn-users-lists.pumacode.org
Mailing list web interface (with searchable archives):
http://dir.gmane.org/gmane.comp.version-control.subversion.vss2svn.user
