Dirk wrote:
Instead of this:
(? - timestamp IN (0, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14,
15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25))
Use something like this:
(ABS(? - timestamp) < 26)
I didn't know better ;-). I don't know SQL syntax and the possibilities.
Is this value in seconds?
Yes
I figured I'd try first turning up the value to 60 and see if that
widened the window sufficiently to sneak all my orphans through. The
time tolerance could also be passed in as a configuration constant.
Yes, we could do so, but if ye make it configureable, we could also
remove it. It was a security measure and I don't think that we really
need it. The only problem to solve is, which one is the correct timestamp?
Had the ABS(...) in my patch for r245 (someone should have seen it if
he'd read it... ;-)
Anyway, back to my question in the last of the postings of that time,
can the same action/object occur several times? If that is true, you'll
also need to sort the findings with ABS (otherwise you'll end up
favouring an object that is -400000 seconds off before one that is 1
second off, in the pairing process).
Greetings,
/Micke
_______________________________________________
vss2svn-users mailing list
Project homepage:
http://www.pumacode.org/projects/vss2svn/
Subscribe/Unsubscribe/Admin:
http://lists.pumacode.org/mailman/listinfo/vss2svn-users-lists.pumacode.org
Mailing list web interface (with searchable archives):
http://dir.gmane.org/gmane.comp.version-control.subversion.vss2svn.user
