Alexander Gavrilov wrote:
Yes, SQLite 3 is available as DBD::SQLite. But I didn't see any noticeable
differences in performance: switching the DB to a ramdisk is a lot
more effective.
So the only argument for switching is that SQLite2 is sort of obsolete. On the
downside, it may bring hidden bugs, like the one in that hunk which adds '+0' to
a request to make it work.

SQLite2 module fails the module test suite (crashes during test) on win32 for me
and wont install, anything is better than that.

H.

Attachment: smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature

_______________________________________________
vss2svn-users mailing list
Project homepage:
http://www.pumacode.org/projects/vss2svn/
Subscribe/Unsubscribe/Admin:
http://lists.pumacode.org/mailman/listinfo/vss2svn-users-lists.pumacode.org
Mailing list web interface (with searchable archives):
http://dir.gmane.org/gmane.comp.version-control.subversion.vss2svn.user

Reply via email to