Alexander Gavrilov wrote:
On Thu, Oct 9, 2008 at 9:38 AM, Toby Johnson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi Alexander, sorry it took me a while to get back... the patch looks fine
to me on the face of it, but then again I'm not really familiar with the
differences between the two versions of SQLite. Is the speed of using either
method comparable? Are you familiar with whether the SQLite3 Perl module is
available on Windows via ActiveState? (I haven't looked yet).
Yes, SQLite 3 is available as DBD::SQLite. But I didn't see any noticeable
differences in performance: switching the DB to a ramdisk is a lot
more effective.
So the only argument for switching is that SQLite2 is sort of obsolete. On the
downside, it may bring hidden bugs, like the one in that hunk which adds '+0' to
a request to make it work.
Well, if you really felt up to it you could abstract the database stuff
out into version-specific modules, then detect which was installed at
runtime. What platform are you currently running on again?
toby
_______________________________________________
vss2svn-users mailing list
Project homepage:
http://www.pumacode.org/projects/vss2svn/
Subscribe/Unsubscribe/Admin:
http://lists.pumacode.org/mailman/listinfo/vss2svn-users-lists.pumacode.org
Mailing list web interface (with searchable archives):
http://dir.gmane.org/gmane.comp.version-control.subversion.vss2svn.user
