Ulises, Facundo, On Fri, Jan 23, 2009 at 11:33 AM, Ulises2k <ulise...@gmail.com> wrote: > Andres, > > On Fri, Jan 23, 2009 at 10:21, Facundo Batista <facundobati...@gmail.com> > wrote: >> >> 2009/1/23 Andres Riancho <andres.rian...@gmail.com>: >> >> > I'm confident enough to call it 1.0; lot's of users have been playing >> > with the SVN version (most of them, mostly because of my failure to >> > release periodically) and I think that if we fix most of the bugs, we >> > can call it 1.0; don't you think? >> >> Last famous words... >> >> It's always good to have previous steps before a final release. >> > I agree with Facundo
Yep, and I had forgotten about a previous thread were we spoke about this. I'm going to upload a release candidate today, and in one week I'm going to release 1.0. Are we ok with this? Cheers, >> Don't follow that (pretty standard) procedure at your own risk... >> >> -- >> . Facundo >> >> Blog: http://www.taniquetil.com.ar/plog/ >> PyAr: http://www.python.org/ar/ >> >> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ >> This SF.net email is sponsored by: >> SourcForge Community >> SourceForge wants to tell your story. >> http://p.sf.net/sfu/sf-spreadtheword >> _______________________________________________ >> W3af-develop mailing list >> W3af-develop@lists.sourceforge.net >> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/w3af-develop > -- Andres Riancho http://w3af.sourceforge.net/ Web Application Attack and Audit Framework ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ This SF.net email is sponsored by: SourcForge Community SourceForge wants to tell your story. http://p.sf.net/sfu/sf-spreadtheword _______________________________________________ W3af-develop mailing list W3af-develop@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/w3af-develop
