Hey Andres

I really think w3af's stability improved :) . It's fantastic that we are going 
to
use Hudson (funny story, at my last employer we integrated w3af in 
hudson as well... sadly I wasn't working on that project...). And I think the
doctests/unit tests will really pay out in the future.

On the other side I had some trouble installing w3af with Mac ports. 
If I remember correctly I installed the gtksourceview package, but w3af
was still complaining about the dependency. I simply took the easy way:
Ubuntu virtual machine :)

As you might have seen [0] I'm already working on one of the automatic
bug report related problems. In general I'm trying to convince my employer
to give me some time for w3af development, I'll tell you if it will happen :)

In general I think some people have trouble installing w3af. One problem
could be that the wiki [1] and trac have quite a bad Google ranking. Maybe
you could place a link on the main w3af page.

Oh, and [2] :)

Ok, now im definitely off topic!

Keep up the good work! Especially Javier, Andres, Taras and Oxdef!

[0] http://sourceforge.net/apps/trac/w3af/ticket/160765
[1] http://sourceforge.net/apps/trac/w3af/wiki
[2] https://sourceforge.net/apps/trac/w3af/ticket/161422

cheers
floyd


 -----
http://www.floyd.ch



----- Ursprüngliche Mail ----
Von: Andres Riancho <andres.rian...@gmail.com>
An: "w3af-develop@lists.sourceforge.net" <W3af-develop@lists.sourceforge.net>; 
w3af-us...@lists.sourceforge.net
Gesendet: Montag, den 31. Januar 2011, 14:06:16 Uhr
Betreff: [W3af-develop] Measuring w3af stability - A hard issue

List,

    I wanted to get your ideas about how stable w3af has been in the
past, and how stable it is now. I completely agree that in the past
the framework was buggy and finishing a complete scan with more than
10 plugins enabled was an epic story to tell your friends :) but right
now my gut feeling is that its getting *much better*. What's your
opinion?

    From the numbers that we see at our Trac we clearly see an
INCREASE in automatic bug reports [0], but most of them are reports
from old versions of the framework (r3731 mostly, which is the version
that was bundled in BackTrack), that have already fixed bugs [1]. On
the other side... these numbers tend to be relative to the amount of
users we have in the framework, and that's not easy to measure
either... so the basic question is: "How do YOU feel about the
framework stability? "

[0] https://sourceforge.net/apps/trac/w3af/report/18
[1] https://sourceforge.net/apps/trac/w3af/report/26

Regards,
-- 
Andrés Riancho
Director of Web Security at Rapid7 LLC
Founder at Bonsai Information Security
Project Leader at w3af

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Special Offer-- Download ArcSight Logger for FREE (a $49 USD value)!
Finally, a world-class log management solution at an even better price-free!
Download using promo code Free_Logger_4_Dev2Dev. Offer expires 
February 28th, so secure your free ArcSight Logger TODAY! 
http://p.sf.net/sfu/arcsight-sfd2d
_______________________________________________
W3af-develop mailing list
W3af-develop@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/w3af-develop




------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Special Offer-- Download ArcSight Logger for FREE (a $49 USD value)!
Finally, a world-class log management solution at an even better price-free!
Download using promo code Free_Logger_4_Dev2Dev. Offer expires 
February 28th, so secure your free ArcSight Logger TODAY! 
http://p.sf.net/sfu/arcsight-sfd2d
_______________________________________________
W3af-develop mailing list
W3af-develop@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/w3af-develop

Reply via email to