On Tue, Dec 30, 2008 at 6:59 PM, Andres Riancho <[email protected]> wrote:
> I don't want to brag about it because w3af should have gotten 100% > in the first test that was done by the wivet developer but... now we > have more code coverage than all the other commercial and free > scanners! The second best is now WebInspect with an impressive 86% [3] > (but I have 100% ;). > My own test with Acunetix 6 yielded 104% http://pic.leech.it/pic.php?id=51aa410a99a6.jpg While 100% is obviously better than 0%, I'd still be mindful of bugs in the testbed :) -- http://www.nukeit.org ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ _______________________________________________ W3af-users mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/w3af-users
