fuzion, On Wed, Dec 31, 2008 at 1:07 AM, John Doesnot <[email protected]> wrote: > On Tue, Dec 30, 2008 at 6:59 PM, Andres Riancho > <[email protected]> wrote: > >> I don't want to brag about it because w3af should have gotten 100% >> in the first test that was done by the wivet developer but... now we >> have more code coverage than all the other commercial and free >> scanners! The second best is now WebInspect with an impressive 86% [3] >> (but I have 100% ;). >> > My own test with Acunetix 6 yielded 104% > http://pic.leech.it/pic.php?id=51aa410a99a6.jpg > While 100% is obviously better than 0%, I'd still be mindful of bugs > in the testbed :)
LOL! I can't beat THAT! =) > -- > http://www.nukeit.org > -- Andres Riancho http://w3af.sourceforge.net/ Web Application Attack and Audit Framework ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ _______________________________________________ W3af-users mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/w3af-users
