Hello Mark,

On 2 September 2015 at 21:38, Mark Janes <mark.a.ja...@intel.com> wrote:
> Emil Velikov <emil.l.veli...@gmail.com> writes:
>
>> On 1 September 2015 at 20:01, Dylan Baker <baker.dyla...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>> Hi Emil,
>>>
>>> Mark and I had talked about testing Waffle in our jenkins setup, but
>>> it just wasn't feasable for some reason I can't remember, I've CC'd
>>> him, hopefully he'll remember.
>
> I'm happy to run waffle tests in our CI.  My recollection is that the
> tests won't succeed without a display server.  Chad had an action to
> produce a way to execute the tests which are not display-dependent.
>
Iirc all the functionality (check-func) tests require some form of a
display. If you/Chad has a bit more information on the topic I won't
mind looking into it.

> We have experienced cases where a mesa commit broke waffle, and would
> like to prevent this.
>
Hopefully you got to reporting it to mesa/waffle ML ?

>> I'm suspecting that the wayland functionality tests were failing, as
>> in my case.
>>
>> Either way using your jenkins setup does not have to be the only
>> solution for CI. After all anyone willing to contribute can check the
>> issues, without chasing you guys. After all, you do have some downtime
>> - sleep and stuff :P.
>>
>> Which brings the question - are the results (build tests, piglit runs)
>> publicly available somewhere ? Last time I've looked one needed to be
>> hooked up to the corporate network to access them :'( Is there any
>> plans/ideas about changing this ?
>
> I would like to improve this, for "important" external developers like
> yourself.  We haven't implemented sufficient security around our Jenkins
> instance to allow it to be accessible outside Intel.  However, it should
> be possible to improve the notification email to the point where
> regressions are clearly identifiable.
>
> We could set up a build to watch your remote, and trigger a build
> whenever you push to a specified branch.  Later, you get an email
> detailing any breakage vs master.
>
> Would you be interested in this type of setup?
>
I still cannot shake the habit of build testing in various ways on my
Arch, so I'm not sure if it will be worth it. Having/working on half
dozen branches doesn't help much either.

Big thanks for the offer though. I might come back to it in the not
too distant future.

-Emil
_______________________________________________
waffle mailing list
waffle@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/waffle

Reply via email to