This
message thread is a great illustration of what can happen when we get casual
about using the handy old "Reply" or "Reply To All" button on our email
programs. As I recall, this discussion started out in response to a
question about what to use this time of year at Lone Lake on Whidbey
Island, then evolved into a question about hike-in fishing
opportunities, which resulted in a suggestion for fishing the Oval Lakes
near Winthrop and now has evolved again into a question about the Ice
Lakes.
All
wonderfully interesting and useful information (heck, I'd never even heard about
Oval Lakes or the Ice Lakes before this). Trouble is, as long as the
Subject line continues to read "Re: Lone Lake" it's difficult for folks to
follow or find later in the archives.
The
fix is simple. When responding to a message with a suggestion for a new
place to fish, or a new way to fish, or other shift in subject, just take a
second to edit the subject line to reflect the new subject under
discussion. If you want to show the continuity to the previous thread,
then you can include at the end something to show where this new thread came
from.
For
instance, when the discussion shifted from Lone Lake places to hike-in and fish,
the subject line could have been edited to read:
Subject: Hike In Fishing (Was RE: Lone
Lake)
and
when that question became a suggestion for checking out the Oval Lakes chain, a
simple subject edit to:
Subject: Oval Lakes (Was: Hike-In
Fishing)
would
allow readers interested in hike-in fishing near Winthrop to quickly find the
post for future reference.
As it
stands now, someone looking for that special message, telling all about how to
fish the Oval Lakes, would have to remember it was part of a message thread
about "Lone Lake" and then find and wade through the 17 messages under that
misleading name. Simple re-editing of the original subject line would have
narrowed the search down to an easy to remember name, with only a couple of
posts specifically on the subject of interest.
Proper
use of the "Subject:" line is an easy and simple thing to do, and a simple
courtesy that makes the great information on this list even more useful and
convenient for others.
-Wes
-----Original Message-----
From: Dan Reynolds [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Saturday, March 03, 2001 8:25 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Lone Lake
From: Dan Reynolds [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Saturday, March 03, 2001 8:25 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Lone Lake
Hi, are you talking about Ice Lakes?Dan----- Original Message -----From: bhtradingSent: 02/28/2001 9:05:55 PMSubject: Re: Lone Lake
It's in the twisp river drainage over by Winthrop. That's the lakes thatcame to mind when you first asked about the trip you're planning. It's afairly moderate hike- I think it's 7-8 miles with the last 3 being the partthat goes uphill. Took me about 4 hours. This is one of my favorite places,gorgeous country with cutts to 19" ( at least they were 5 years ago)-thefirst lake you come to is west oval which has the nicest fish &makes a goodbase camp; then you can go on to the other two lakes from there. I think itwould be a good place for your group. There is backcast room & the fish arewilling although it's not a slam dunk. can give you more info if you like.bill hamilton----- Original Message -----From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>Sent: Tuesday, February 27, 2001 10:47 PMSubject: Re: Lone Lake> I'm curious as to where the Oval chain lakes are?>--- Dan Reynolds--- EarthLink: It's your Internet.
