Richard, I have only 36,000 miles on my Ranger. I drive a mile and a half to
my office. So, it's probably too soon to tell about longevity. From what I
hear, if it has any bearing, the Ranger and Mazda are basically the same
truck. 


Gary Meyers
Kirkland


> From: "rderedfield" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Date: Tue, 4 Dec 2001 09:23:46 -0800
> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Subject: Re: Fishing vehicles?
> Resent-From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Resent-Date: Tue, 4 Dec 2001 09:25:45 -0800
> 
> Gary, how many miles do you have on the Ranger?  I usually keep my vehicles
> for 100k+ miles and, for some reason, I've had concerns the Rangers may not
> be those types of vehicles.
> 
> Cheers!
> 
> Richard
> 
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Gary Meyers" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Sent: Monday, December 03, 2001 4:50 PM
> Subject: Re: Fishing vehicles?
> 
> 
>> Good discussion topic, Kent.
>> 
>> I've got a Ford Ranger Pick-up almost identical to yours, but a year older
>> (1997). Same plusses and minuses. I too, really wish it had those small
> rear
>> doors. It's a pain in the butt sometimes to access the back seat. And yes,
>> it's tough to get a long rod caddy in the back. I tow a utility trailer
> and
>> inflated raft with it and no problem��plenty of power. It's perfect for
> one
>> or two people. I think it's the most comfortable vehicle I've ever driven.
>> I'm tall and it fits me well. I can drive 12-14 hours (such as to Montana)
>> without getting fatigued. I think it's great truck and fishing rig
> overall.
>> Good ground clearance. Maneuverable. Tight. Good 4WD (I take it skiing
> too).
>> No mechanical problems. Plus it had Firestones. So I got 4 free new tires
>> from Ford.
>> 
>> I also have a '98 Suburban and if I'm hauling a crowd or going somewhere
>> where I'm camping and I want my gear secure, I'll take it. Surprisingly,
> it
>> gets decent highway mileage. Sometimes 20+ mpg. But, I find it
>> uncomfortable. The front seats are cramped for such a big vehicle. And of
>> course it's a pig to park and drive around town.  Whenever possible, I'll
>> drive the Ranger.
>> 
>> Gary Meyers
>> Kirkland
>> 
>> 
>> 
>>> Over the years, we've discussed just about every kind of fishing gear
>>> or strategy imaginable. But it struck me the other day that there's
>>> still one indispensable piece of gear that every one of us uses: the
>>> vehicle that gets us where we fish.
>>> 
>>> I assume that for most of us, our fishing vehicle is also our daily
>>> driver that spends most of its time making trips to the store or
>>> commuting. For some of us in a multi-car household, a second vehicle
>>> may be much more appropriate for fishing. A very few of us may
>>> actually have a rig dedicated just for fishing, refined over years of
>>> use.
>>> 
>>> To get the ball rolling, here's my own 2� on the subject:
>>> 
>>> I've always owned a pickup. In fact I can only remember a couple
>>> years when I didn't have one. My current ride is a 1998 Ford Ranger
>>> XLT extra cab 4x4 with a 4.0 liter V-6 and an automatic. Wish I'd got
>>> it with the small, half-sized doors to get behind the front seats.
>>> However, a retractable cover keeps things out of sight back there.
>>> 
>>> The bed will hold a couple float tubes fully inflated or my 9 foot
>>> pontoon boat (I haven't tried stacking two pontoon boats back there
>>> yet.) There's plenty of room left over for gear bags, coolers, oars
>>> or rod tubes. Plus, the bed doubles as a place to sit and wader up
>>> without rocks that can tear up my neoprene wader feet.
>>> 
>>> But having a pickup does pose some limitations. Leaving stuff in the
>>> back is an open invitation to theft if you leave it there even
>>> briefly. And relatively light weight stuff needs to be tied down to
>>> keep it from becoming airborne at highway speeds.
>>> 
>>> My truck's bed isn't long enough that I can stretch out in it to
>>> sleep, and I'd need some sort of canopy to stay dry in the rain. The
>>> space behind the seats doesn't hold very much gear (long rod tubes
>>> are an especially tight fit) and it's a real pain to get to. Finally,
>>> if I owned a boat and trailer, my rig is probably much too puny for
>>> serious towing.
>>> 
>>> But for the most part, it works well for the kind of fishing I do.
>>> The 4wd and high ground clearance are a real plus on marginal roads.
>>> 
>>> I'd sure like to hear how other subscribers have adapted their
>>> vehicles for their own fishing style.
>>> 
>>> Kent Lufkin
>>> 
>>> 
>> 
>> 
> 
> 

Reply via email to