Interesting report Kent.

You guys must have read the Northwest Fly Fishing magazine article on Omak.


-- 
Gary Meyers
Kirkland
 

> Listmembers Les Korcala, Sean Grier and I lit out for Omak Lake early
> Wednesday morning. After stopping at Cascade Outiftters in Omak to
> pick up a tribal fishing permit, we were on the water by 11am.
> 
> This was my first visit to Omak Lake and I was struck by two things:
> it's REALLY big (8 miles long and a mile wide in parts - think of
> Lake Sammamish and you won't be far off); and it's REALLY deep at 325
> feet max. The bottom drops right off, so the littoral zone is
> literally only a few away from the shoreline. At one point, I thought
> I'd drop anchor an easy cast away from the west side shoreline. My
> anchor dropped right up to the end of it's 50 foot rope without
> finding bottom.
> 
> Weather was partly cloudy both days, sunnier Wednesday with less wind
> when we fished the north end. Air temp was in the mid-40s although it
> felt much warmer when the sun popped out. Water temp was an even 42
> degrees but it was a bit murky, suggesting that the lake might be
> getting ready to turn over. The water is quite alkaline, leaving a
> soapy, slippery feeling to the touch and white evaporation rings from
> drops on rods, glasses and pontoons. There was no sign of underwater
> vegetation and the only insect activity was a sparse hatch of very
> small (size 28?) black gnats and a handful of small (size 22?), tan
> mayflies that produced a very few swirls midafternoon Wednesday. Les
> reported finding a couple of damsel nymphs.
> 
> By the time we got off the water at about 5pm, we had brought just
> two Lahontan cutts to hand, had another couple LDRs and a few bumps.
> Both fish were 18 inchers, one a silvery female and the other a
> beautiful bronze male. The female fell for a black bugger and the
> male for a size 16 mylar chironomid (yep, with a cheap craft store
> glass bead head :-) on a long leader with no indicator. The same
> chironomid produced one of the LDRs a half hour later.
> 
> Pretty skimpy results for 18 angler-hours on the water and God only
> knows how many fly changes trying to dial in it.
> 
> Thursday, we drove to the south end and launched our little flotilla
> in stiff south wind. The fish seemed even more dispersed that the
> previous day, although the drop-off was less steep than at the north
> end. A few tiny chironomids and husks were visible, but otherwise
> there was no insect activity. And no signs of fish. We LDR'd one fish
> on a black bugger/green leech tandem and landed a fat 22 inch bronze
> buck on a white bugger, along with a few bumps. We pulled out early
> after three hours on the water.
> 
> Bottom line: three fish to hand, three LDRs and several bumps from a
> total of 27 angler-hours. Looking at the catch records in the
> mailboxes the tribal biologists leave, that seems consistent with
> what others reported over the past week or so.
> 
> At four hours each way, Omak Lake was a long drive from the Eastside
> for just three fish, even if they were good-sized fish. The lake is
> certainly worth a return visit, but probably not until after it's
> turned over and a bit warmer.
> 
> BTW, the entire lake is on the Colville Indian Reservation and
> camping's a no-no. If you're think of visiting, you'll probably want
> to stay in a motel in Omak. The Rodeway in old Omak was $59 for three
> of us including breakfast. A cowboy bar down the street served up a
> great $10 prime rib dinner with Black Butte Porter and Alaskan Amber
> on tap to wash it down. I'll never forget our night together either
> Sean ;-)
> 
> Kent Lufkin
> 
> 

Reply via email to