I dropped into the store in Pateros behind the Chevron station last Wednesday and the guy behind the counter said that there was a supplementary reg out indicating steelheading was o.k. til 3/1/03. To disregard the book. That any size hook o.k. but couldn't use bait!, My brother-in-law said he had heard that at several other fly fishing stores in Wenatchee. I read the regs & they indicate nothing but whitefish. Is there a supplemental reg out there somewhere or are these guys feeding us mis information. We Spoke with one local guy on the river above Pateros that said the info we had was correct. He had been hitting steelies with black leeches with red color in them. Same info from guy at the store. Am going back up to Twisp 3/1 & 3/2 as son is ski racing at Loup Loup that weekend. Will check into this further........Dennis
-----Original Message----- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Sean Grier Sent: Friday, February 21, 2003 11:39 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: Omak Lake report Well, if they're on the Methow, I sure couldn't find 'em. I tried from just Below the town of Methow all the way up to Twisp. No takes. It's Especially hard given that those fishing for Steelhead under the guise of whitefishing (when the steelhead season was closed last year) have screwed it up for the rest of us. The regs now say you can only fish for white fish with a SINGLE size 14 or smaller hook - no trailer fly allowed. As many know, folks were dropping big weighted steelhead flies with a tiny whitefish fly dropper to fool the gandarmes into thinking they were really just whitefishing, when in fact they were targetting stellies. Well, our WDFW folks aren't that stupid, and have changed the rules. I LIKE tying a big weighted fly on in order to get down deep. I have an unnatural aversion to pinching lead onto my leader - it damages the fine tippet and it's not healthy for the environment. The other thing I like about a big fly followed by a littler fly is that I think the big fly is more readily spotted by the fish and thus their attention is easily drawn to my size 18/20 BHPT. Just a theory. So anyway, my mood was as foul as the weather up on the Methow as I pinched weight to my leader and hunted the holes and drop offs for whities. None to be found, but I saw plenty of gearjammers on the lower Meth hunting Steelies. Is the Meth open for steelhead? The regs seem to show otherwise, but maybe there's been a special season allowed by WDFW. Glad to be back over the pass before the really bad weather hits. Sean ----- Original Message ----- From: "Kent Lufkin" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Friday, February 21, 2003 10:57 AM Subject: Re: Omak Lake report > I thought you were off looking for whitefish big boy ;-) > > Kent Lufkin > > >Hey, Kent, I think that last line was SUPPOSED to be off-line.... > > > >Sean > >----- Original Message ----- > >From: "Kent Lufkin" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > >To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > >Sent: Friday, February 21, 2003 9:25 AM > >Subject: Omak Lake report > > > > > >> Listmembers Les Korcala, Sean Grier and I lit out for Omak Lake early > >> Wednesday morning. After stopping at Cascade Outiftters in Omak to > >> pick up a tribal fishing permit, we were on the water by 11am. > >> > >> This was my first visit to Omak Lake and I was struck by two things: > >> it's REALLY big (8 miles long and a mile wide in parts - think of > >> Lake Sammamish and you won't be far off); and it's REALLY deep at 325 > >> feet max. The bottom drops right off, so the littoral zone is > >> literally only a few away from the shoreline. At one point, I thought > >> I'd drop anchor an easy cast away from the west side shoreline. My > >> anchor dropped right up to the end of it's 50 foot rope without > >> finding bottom. > >> > >> Weather was partly cloudy both days, sunnier Wednesday with less wind > >> when we fished the north end. Air temp was in the mid-40s although it > >> felt much warmer when the sun popped out. Water temp was an even 42 > >> degrees but it was a bit murky, suggesting that the lake might be > >> getting ready to turn over. The water is quite alkaline, leaving a > >> soapy, slippery feeling to the touch and white evaporation rings from > >> drops on rods, glasses and pontoons. There was no sign of underwater > >> vegetation and the only insect activity was a sparse hatch of very > >> small (size 28?) black gnats and a handful of small (size 22?), tan > >> mayflies that produced a very few swirls midafternoon Wednesday. Les > >> reported finding a couple of damsel nymphs. > >> > >> By the time we got off the water at about 5pm, we had brought just > >> two Lahontan cutts to hand, had another couple LDRs and a few bumps. > >> Both fish were 18 inchers, one a silvery female and the other a > >> beautiful bronze male. The female fell for a black bugger and the > >> male for a size 16 mylar chironomid (yep, with a cheap craft store > >> glass bead head :-) on a long leader with no indicator. The same > >> chironomid produced one of the LDRs a half hour later. > >> > >> Pretty skimpy results for 18 angler-hours on the water and God only > >> knows how many fly changes trying to dial in it. > >> > >> Thursday, we drove to the south end and launched our little flotilla > >> in stiff south wind. The fish seemed even more dispersed that the > >> previous day, although the drop-off was less steep than at the north > >> end. A few tiny chironomids and husks were visible, but otherwise > > > there was no insect activity. And no signs of fish. We LDR'd one fish > > > on a black bugger/green leech tandem and landed a fat 22 inch bronze > > > buck on a white bugger, along with a few bumps. We pulled out early > >> after three hours on the water. > >> > >> Bottom line: three fish to hand, three LDRs and several bumps from a > >> total of 27 angler-hours. Looking at the catch records in the > >> mailboxes the tribal biologists leave, that seems consistent with > >> what others reported over the past week or so. > >> > >> At four hours each way, Omak Lake was a long drive from the Eastside > >> for just three fish, even if they were good-sized fish. The lake is > >> certainly worth a return visit, but probably not until after it's > >> turned over and a bit warmer. > >> > >> BTW, the entire lake is on the Colville Indian Reservation and > >> camping's a no-no. If you're think of visiting, you'll probably want > >> to stay in a motel in Omak. The Rodeway in old Omak was $59 for three > >> of us including breakfast. A cowboy bar down the street served up a > >> great $10 prime rib dinner with Black Butte Porter and Alaskan Amber > >> on tap to wash it down. I'll never forget our night together either > >> Sean ;-) > >> > >> Kent Lufkin > >> >
