One of the other "cool" new features with the 27" iMac I read, is that with
a third party cable (coming out soon), you can actually use the 27" iMac as
a monitor on another machine (as long as it has miniDisplayPort).
Can see that as being useful in some instances.

But yes, the new top of the range i7 sounds like it's going to be quite a
good machine. And well priced!
Especially for Quad cores!! :o)
And now with it being larger it has 4 RAM Slots as well (up from 2), as it's
"longer base".
I also read with the larger size the sound quality is improved as well, as
they've had more room to work with the speaker system (or placement) of it
to get better sound.

(Side note to Martin. Should I guess you'd be loving one of these to replace
your "eyeTVMac") ;o) hehe.
All round looks like a nice upgrade I think.

Kind Regards
Daniel


On 22/10/09 12:01 PM, "Martin Hill" <marth...@iinet.net.au> wrote:

> 
> The Turbo-boost feature of the quad-core Core i5 and i7 chips can shut
> down unused cores and boost the clock speed of the remaining cores to
> much faster clock speeds depending on usage:
> 
> The 2.66 GHz Core i5 has a Turbo Boost speed of up to 3.20 GHz
> the 2.8 GHz Core i7 can go up to 3.46 GHz in Turbo Boost mode.
> 
> At the other end of the spectrum, the Core i7 also supports Hyper-
> threading which effectively gives you twice the number of logical
> cores for a grand total of 8 cores.  If you need to run lots of apps
> at once or you have things like video compression jobs and VMware and
> other multi-threaded apps running and want to spread your load over
> multiple CPUs, this feature can be very useful.  The Core i5 however
> does not support Hyper-threading.
> 
> I've found hyper-threading very useful on my 8-core Nehalem Mac Pro as
> with hyper-threading Mac OS X shows it is running on a 16 core
> monster.  I am able to fully max out my 12GBs of RAM running several
> video compression jobs (which are each multi-threaded over up to 4
> cores each), dual-core Windows XP and a second dual-core VM running
> Vista, and a stack of other Mac apps without any slow downs at all.
> It is not quite as fast as 16 real cores, but it definitely does
> encoding and other multi-threaded tasks faster than 8 maxed-out
> physical cores.   (having 4 x 1TB drives hardware RAIDed internally
> helps a lot as well so that disk access doesn't become the bottleneck).
> 
> -Mart
> 
> On 22/10/2009, at 9:32 AM, Craig Bruce wrote:
> 
>> 
>> Indeed the 2.66 is a core i5 quad core rather than a core 2 dual core
>> it can also be build with the core i7 as a custom build
>> --
>> 
>> Craig Bruce
>> Director
>> 
>> M  0403 040 088
>> P  08 9367 4691
>> F  08 9367 4692
>> E  craig.br...@maxstyle.com.au
>> W http://www.maxstyle.com.au
>> 
>> Twitter Maxstyle_com_au
>> Facebook http://www.facebook.com/maxstyle
>> 
>> Disclaimer: The information transmitted on this message is intended
>> only for the person or organisation to which it is addressed and may
>> contain confidential and/or privileged material.  If you are not the
>> intended recipient of this message, you are hereby notified that any
>> use, dissemination, distribution, reproduction or any action taken
>> in reliance of this message is strictly prohibited.  If you have
>> received this message in error, please contact MaxStyle Pty Ltd
>> immediately.  Any views expressed in this message are those of the
>> individual sender and may not necessarily reflect the views of the
>> company.
>> 
>> On 22/10/2009, at 9:17 AM, Daniel Forsdyke wrote:
>> 
>>> 
>>> Hi Adrian
>>> 
>>> I believe the 'slower' machine has a quad core processor rather
>>> than the dual core on the other one.
>>> 
>>> Regards
>>> Daniel Forsdyke
>>> --
>>> An Apple iPhone creation
>>> 
>>> On 22/10/2009, at 9:13, Adrian Skehan <adrianske...@mac.com> wrote:
>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> Good morning all,
>>>> 
>>>> Looking at the latest iMac I notice that the 27-inch: 3.06GHz list
>>>> price is $2,199 and the 27-inch: 2.66GHz is $2,599 that is an
>>>> extra $300 for a seemingly slower machine.  Have I missed
>>>> something or is 2.66GHz quicker than 3.06GHz?
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> Regards,
>>>> 
>>>> Adrian
>>>> adrianske...@me.com
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> -- The WA Macintosh User Group Mailing List --
>>>> Archives - <http://www.wamug.org.au/mailinglist/archives.shtml>
>>>> Guidelines - <http://www.wamug.org.au/mailinglist/guidelines.shtml>
>>>> Unsubscribe - <mailto:wamug-unsubscr...@wamug.org.au>
>>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> -- The WA Macintosh User Group Mailing List --
>>> Archives - <http://www.wamug.org.au/mailinglist/archives.shtml>
>>> Guidelines - <http://www.wamug.org.au/mailinglist/guidelines.shtml>
>>> Unsubscribe - <mailto:wamug-unsubscr...@wamug.org.au>
>>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> -- The WA Macintosh User Group Mailing List --
>> Archives - <http://www.wamug.org.au/mailinglist/archives.shtml>
>> Guidelines - <http://www.wamug.org.au/mailinglist/guidelines.shtml>
>> Unsubscribe - <mailto:wamug-unsubscr...@wamug.org.au>
>> 
> 
> 
> 
> -- The WA Macintosh User Group Mailing List --
> Archives - <http://www.wamug.org.au/mailinglist/archives.shtml>
> Guidelines - <http://www.wamug.org.au/mailinglist/guidelines.shtml>
> Unsubscribe - <mailto:wamug-unsubscr...@wamug.org.au>
> 

---
Daniel Kerr
MacWizardry

Phone: 0414 795 960
Email: <daniel @ macwizardry . com . au>
Web:   <http://www.macwizardry.com.au>


**For everything Macintosh**




-- The WA Macintosh User Group Mailing List --
Archives - <http://www.wamug.org.au/mailinglist/archives.shtml>
Guidelines - <http://www.wamug.org.au/mailinglist/guidelines.shtml>
Unsubscribe - <mailto:wamug-unsubscr...@wamug.org.au>