Claes Persson wrote:
> Se bottom.
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: rod/christine <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Sent: Saturday, July 27, 2002 3:43 PM
> Subject: RE: {W&P} SV: Even conservatives smell a rat in the White House
>
>
> > see the below part.
> >
> > ===
> >
> > Claes Persson wrote:
> > > ----- Original Message -----
> > > From: rod/christine <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > > To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > > Sent: Saturday, July 27, 2002 5:17 AM
> > > Subject: {W&P} Even conservatives smell a rat in the White House
> > >
> > >
> > > > Even conservatives smell a rat in the White House
> > > >
> > > >
>http://cgi.newcity.com/exitlog/frameset.php?close=http://www.newmassmedia.com/nac.phtml?code=har&db=nac_fea&ref=21338&back=http://www.newcity.com
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > ====================
> > > >
> > >
> > > The starting to wonder over facts can be expected. There always come
> > > more or less founded theories to what really have happend.
> >
> > ===
> >
> > What gets me is all the US government warnings about the terrorists who
> > are about to strike! Now, come on already, these terrorist "sleeper"
> > cells must have actually 'fallen asleep' -- where are they? If all
> > these "arab loonies" (nothing personal) are in the US at the present
> > moment - what are they waiting for?
> >
> > The government is a bag of hot air (bush and clinton included) and i
> > think the taxpayer is being taken for a ride on this one. The innocents
> >
> > who lost their life, on 9-11, didn't deserve to die.
> >
> > Where was the fighter-interceptor squadron at the nearby military base?
> >
> > (the name of the base eludes me at the moment) The military base
> > website has been altered - shortly after 9-11 - why? i don't know. My
> > understanding is that the surveillance officers were told to "stand
> > down" and "do nothing". The radar data of the airliners is not
> > available for that time period (has been locked away) for National
> > Security Reasons. <spooky>
> >
> > ===
> >
> > >
> > > Something I can not get passed is the fact that the bid airliner that's
> > > supposed to have hit Pentagon seems to have been flying without wings
> > > and engines. The hole after this aeroplane is far too small for a big
> > > airliner to have dissppeared insid compleatelly. Specially as the hole
> > > at first was just a hole in the wall. Now... Where are those giant wings
> > >
> > > and the enormous engines? The aeroplanes wingspan is many times bigger
> > > than the hole in the wall. Any one have an answere?
> > >
> > >
> >
> > ===
> >
> > I believe, the wings on these aircraft, are designed to "break off" on
> > impact (the building in this case).
> >
> > The engines and wings (full of fuel) slammed into the building at a
> > couple hundred miles per hour - and burned for a couple days!
> >
> > Why so little damage to that part of the Pentagon? Here's why!
> >
> > >>>That portion of the Pentagon structure had been "reinforced" with a
> > >>>"Kevlar-type" of building material.<<< Something like a bulletproof
> > >>>jacket etc. This is why their was so little damage to the outer facade
> > >>>of the building.
> >
> > >>>The windows were two-inch-thick bulletproof-bombproof special composite
> > >>>material (still top-secret) and cost $10,000 a window pane.<<<
> >
> > Had the airliner hit "any other" portion of the Pentagon - and it would
> > have been a colossal catastrophe. The "refurbishing" (facelift) of the
> > Pentagon is an ongoing, 20-year project. The cost "estimate" is 2
> > Billion Dollars.
> >
> > On top of that, the Pentagon was built on top of an old swamp! So, the
> > building, is slowly sinking... the sump pumps are running constantly -
> > sucking out the water from the bowels of the building.
> >
> > That part of the building had been reinforced with a "Kevlar" type of
> > material. I'm trying to relate it to you, in the simplest of terms. My
> >
> > american english is quite shabby the way it is!
> >
> > The Pentagon restoration is due, in part, to the Marine Barracks being
> > blownup in Beirut - the Khobar Towers in Saudi Arabia - the (first)
> > World Trade Center incident in the early 90's - and other bombing
> > incidents at various locations throughout the world.
> >
> >
> > Rod
> >
>
> That do open up an other question. If the building really was a very
> strong construction the majority of the plane should be left outside,
> but nothing can be seen. I don't get it.
>
> Claes
===
The people who reinforced (kevlar) it "probably" didn't foresee a jet
airliner crashing into the building.
The jet & people aboard were incinerated to dust and ashes.
A brother of mine saw some of the aftermath of 9-11 in both New York and
Pentagon in early October. He said it reminded him of the devastation
he saw in Yugoslavia (Belgrade) from American bombs & cruise missiles,
etc. We sided with the Al-Qaeda in Yugoslavia conflict - so i don't
quite ubderstand who we are fighting. Guess it depends whether the
Democrats or Republicans are inhabitants of the White House.
He says there are a lot of security videotapes that show the jet
crashing into the Pentagon. Obviously - the are classified Top Secret -
Eyes Only.
Its a twisted world - we are on Al-Qaeda's side in Yugoslavia proper -
and against them in Afghanistan! Go figure?!!
MSNBC = Bill Gates
Fox News = Ruppert Murdoch
CNN = ???
The American People (commoners) = lied to by the government
It's a mad mad mad mad world.
The United States is a warlike nation. Big business in killing.
Rod
.
___________________________________________________________
Check out http://clik.to/sf for other lists to join.
A93MR48T18
==^================================================================
This email was sent to: archive@jab.org
EASY UNSUBSCRIBE click here: http://topica.com/u/?b1dhdK.b1tdRU
Or send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
T O P I C A -- Register now to manage your mail!
http://www.topica.com/partner/tag02/register
==^================================================================
