[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

> 
> I do say that you are not only lumping all in one category. You are 
> seeing everything in black and white. Everything that's not like in USA 
> is suspect, is it not? The conservative propaganda is quite effective as 
> many in US are not interrested of anything but US. The reference frames 
> will naturally be limited. Everything to the left og US is communism, 
> right? Or socialism. It sounds better but it's really the same, right? I 
> don't understand how it's possible for US to work togeather with Tony 
> Blair! He's the leader of the english Social Democrats (in english: 
> Labour).
> 
> Of course Social Democrats are socialists when americans read that name. 
> It's really Social as in Social Security and not Social as in Socialism, 
> but for a brainwashed conservative american it's far beyond his or her 
> comprahension, right?
> 
> And this comparison of US with China or Zimbabwe or any other of the 
> poorest part of the world? Why not compare with other countrys in the 
> developed world. Northern Europe or what ever. In Sweden (in order to 
> take a country that I'm familiar with) the Social Democrats are at the 
> moment in government (with support by the left and the enviromentalists) 
> but a few years ago they were not. That's why it's a demcratic party. It 
> has to get the peoples trust or else...
> 
> Since when was there a change in US? That no rightwingpartys depending 
> of corporate funds were in government? As far as I know: never! Any 
> party not letting the corporate Amerca rule the country get no funds 
> there, right? The tax deductions to the corporations tell their story. I 
> think that US is a close to corporate dictatorship. Open your eyes!
> 
> 
--------------------------

I SEE all the shades of gray. But when the time comes to make choices 
and take action I don't keep dithering back-and-forth like Hamlet about 
what to do. Socialism is bad. But I can cooperate with socialists if I 
need them to help fight a greater, more immediate threat.

I'm a pragmatist and a US nationalist. And proud of it.

Little boutique socialist countries that are tiny specks in a great 
ocean of thriving free enterprise capitalism can thrive and prosper as 
long as they use clever business practices when dealing with the 
capitalist world. Sweden is highyly socialized but Saab and Volvo are 
healthy capitalistic enterprises in their business practices. 

(Europeans have had the use of a lot of their revenue for social 
programs for a long time. That's because their defense budgets have been 
small. US taxpayers have provided much of Europe's military defense for 
the last several decades.) 

If the whole world went socialist the world economy would become very 
stagnant and poor. 

___________________________________________________________
Check out http://clik.to/sf for other lists to join.


A93MR48T18

==^================================================================
This email was sent to: archive@jab.org

EASY UNSUBSCRIBE click here: http://topica.com/u/?b1dhdK.b1tdRU
Or send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

T O P I C A -- Register now to manage your mail!
http://www.topica.com/partner/tag02/register
==^================================================================

Reply via email to