On Monday, 21 August 2006 at 15:35, Dennis Schridde wrote:
> Am Montag, 21. August 2006 14:21 schrieb Per Inge Mathisen:
> > On 8/21/06, Dennis Schridde <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > Currently opinions on what we actually call ourselves seem to differ a
> > > lot. There is "Warzone Resurrection", "Warzone (Re)Development", "Warzone
> > > 2100", "Warzone 2100 GPL" and probably others.
> >
> > The project's name is "Warzone Resurrection", everything else is
> > obsolete. The game is still "Warzone 2100".
> So no GPL in it? (I saw that in Rod's installers I think). Ok.
> 
> > > Now we need to find exactly one clear and easy name for the project and
> > > our executable files.
> > >
> > > The package is currently called games-strategy/warzone2100 on Gentoo and
> > > seemingly Debian wants to name it similar. Thus they also want to rename
> > > the exe to warzone2100.
> >
> > Fine by me.
> So we rename our binary to warzone2100 ?
> 
> So we got:
> Package name: Warzone 2100

I'd keep the 'GPL' part to distinguish it from the commercial version
(might save some (OK, probably not many) of those "Why don't the movies
work?" questions).

> Project (creators) name: Warzone Resurrection
> Binary name: warzone2100
> Correct?
> 
> Shall we occupy /usr/share/warzone2100 then? (We need to keep consistent)


Oh, and for the networking stuff this might be interesting (though it's
not crossplatform yet):
http://www.linuxgames.com/news/feedback.php?identiferID=8596&action=flatview



-- 
Chemistry is applied theology.
                -- Augustus Stanley Owsley III

_______________________________________________
Warzone-dev mailing list
[email protected]
https://mail.gna.org/listinfo/warzone-dev

Reply via email to