[EMAIL PROTECTED] schreef: > On Mon, 23 Apr 2007 08:53:38 -0400 The Watermelon > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> ofcourse we should,many users including myself uses MSVC to >> compile,and I >> couldnt recall any free software I have used doesnt support MSVC >> project/compiler >> As for Watermelon's comment: supporting something purely and only because many users use it is stupid (i.e. numbers alone should not be the motivation for supporting MSVC). I do believe there might be other reasons for supporting MSVC, but I don't see number of users to be a valid reason in that list. > MSVC has best editor/debugger around. Well that is of course your opinion, so I'm not going to say anything for or against that. > Download the free express > version, and you will see it really is excellent. > Sure, if you can tell me where to get it. And then only the free version of course (not free as in beer, free as in freedom).
I have no problem with just doing a testrun or two with that compiler, but actually using it is not something I would want to do. > I no see real reason for use C99 specific code though, sometime it > is bit easier, but only gcc supports it. Original code is pure C, > so will be shame to fork project if C99 will be used. :( > Well a very good reason: readability and ease of maintenance. I'm just having trouble with making it ourselves difficult to maintain code purely and only because company X doesn't support its product anymore (i.e. in any other way than fixing some bugs in it). -- Giel
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
_______________________________________________ Warzone-dev mailing list Warzone-dev@gna.org https://mail.gna.org/listinfo/warzone-dev
