Am Dienstag, 12. Februar 2008 10:01:26 schrieb Dennis Schridde: > Am Montag, 11. Februar 2008 23:41:51 schrieb Giel van Schijndel: > > Dennis Schridde schreef: > > > Am Sonntag, 10. Februar 2008 20:26:55 schrieb Dennis Schridde: > > >> Am Sonntag, 10. Februar 2008 16:17:28 schrieb Giel van Schijndel: > > >>> I propose that we branch of trunk to a 2.1 branch and push out a > > >>> first release candidate for 2.1 today. > > >>> > > >>> Yes, I know there are bugs left (plenty of them), but we cannot > > >>> reasonably expect to fix all of them without user feedback. And just > > >>> sitting and waiting won't help us at all. > > >>> > > >>> So therefore I suggest we release a 2.1 RC1 today (and branch & tag > > >>> it). Then at least upload a source tarball (to get the distro boys > > >>> and self compilers started), the binaries are of a lesser high > > >>> priority (i.e. we shouldn't wait with releasing the source tarball > > >>> nor a release announcement on the binaries). > > >> > > >> You have got my ok. ;) > > >> > > >> I don't have any time atm, so you will have to go without me. > > > > > > PS: > > > Seems I still got this out in time: > > > Please, please, please dont call it a RC. > > > I do _not_ consider it to be complete enough to be a candidate for > > > release, so we should not name it that. > > > > Alpha ? Beta ? > > Oups, sorry... Wanted to write that. > I would have named it 2.1_beta1, but 2.1_alpha1 is of course also ok with > me. ;) Still no time... Can someone keep me informed? What happened to our lovely 2.1_beta, which was planned for sunday, but apparently is still hold back by something? Any specific issues?
--Dennis
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
_______________________________________________ Warzone-dev mailing list Warzone-dev@gna.org https://mail.gna.org/listinfo/warzone-dev
