Am Montag, 3. März 2008 17:40:25 schrieb Giel van Schijndel:
> Dennis Schridde schreef:
> > Am Sonntag, 2. März 2008 15:02:50 schrieb Giel van Schijndel:
> >> Author: muggenhor
> >> Date: Sun Mar  2 15:02:47 2008
> >> New Revision: 3890
> >>
> >> URL: http://svn.gna.org/viewcvs/warzone?rev=3890&view=rev
> >> Log:
> >> Add some "release notes" containing some status info about the current
> >> status of 2.1
> >>
> >> Added:
> >>     branches/2.1/doc/2.1-RELEASE_NOTES.txt   (with props)
> >>     trunk/doc/2.1-RELEASE_NOTES.txt   (with props)
> >
> > It seems as if this is a duplication with ChangeLog and Readme.txt...
>
> In part, yes, it are just some random notes which I think may be useful
> to tell users (in a next release announcement) to describe the status of
> warzone. It is just meant to function as a scratchpad to dump some
> thoughts. I.e. it isn't meant (by me) to be contained in the release
> tarball.
>
> The largest difference between the readme+changelog and this file is
> that these "release-notes" contain a _selection_ of information from the
> readme+changelog+bugreports which I consider to be "important to know
> about".
>
> Maybe the wiki is a better place to dump this info?
Perhaps.

GNU project do it like this: Store the whole commit log in ChangeLog and 
provide a selection in a NEWS file.
I've been thinking about that once, but it did not seem to make sense in our 
case. And currently I like the wiki idea more.

--Dennis

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.

_______________________________________________
Warzone-dev mailing list
[email protected]
https://mail.gna.org/listinfo/warzone-dev

Reply via email to