Giel van Schijndel schreef: > Dennis Schridde schreef: >> Additionaly this does not look very much like GPL2+, does it? >> I'd prefer to keep down the number of used licenses to a minimum. >> Additionaly I would like to keep down the number of authors, and rather >> mention the Warzone 2100 Resurrection Project in every copyright header and >> all authors in the AUTHORS file, than having each file have its own author, >> which makes it imo more complicated to keep an overview. > > Nope it isn't GPLv2+, I've licensed those particular files under the > terms of the new BSD license. > > I've done this on purpose because I consider this implementation to have > potential to be very useful outside of Warzone as well. Therefore by > using this license (which is very close to public domain, which SQLite > is released as) the audience that has can actually use this has widened. > > That said, the new BSD license is compatible with the GPL so Warzone > 2100 as a whole will still remain GPLv2.
Since PhysicsFS is licensed under the zlib license I'll relicense those files to that while I'm working on it. Then when I'm finished we can still move to GPLv2, though for the above reasons I would like to keep it licensed under the terms & conditions of that license. @Dennis: please give me your opinion about this. -- Giel
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
_______________________________________________ Warzone-dev mailing list [email protected] https://mail.gna.org/listinfo/warzone-dev
