On Sun, Mar 15, 2009 at 08:09:19PM +0100, Dennis Schridde wrote:
> Am Sonntag, 15. März 2009 18:15:32 schrieb bugs buggy:
>> Was wondering what port should we change 2.2 to use?
>> 2.0.x was using:  (do we still have a 2.0 lobby server?)
>> gameserver_port: 9999
>> masterserver_port: 9998
>> 2.1 is using:
>> gameserver_port: 9999
>> masterserver_port: 9997
>> Do we switch to 10000 for 2.2 & trunk?
> We should use one of 49152 - 65535, the rest is registered by IANA.
> And till we get an own registered port, I think it might be a good idea to 
> use 
> a private port instead.

How about an entirely different approach. I was thinking about using an
approach similar to what a lot of P2P applications use. I.e. allow the
user to specify a range or list of ranges (ddd-ddd,ddd,ddd,ddd-ddd,ddd),
then start trying these ports until we get one for which the lobby
server confirms it is reachable?

Obviously we should exclude port 9998 and 9999 from that list by


Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature

Warzone-dev mailing list

Reply via email to