On 4/11/10, Guangcong Luo wrote: > Anyway, w.r.t. to our future, I have a new idea: We branch 2.4 right > before merging in Qt and newnet. Trunk is reasonably stable, and the > last time we branched trunk was over a year ago. Getting current trunk > to stable should be a reasonably fast process, but debugging Qt and > newnet could be very long-term stuff. >
That would work for me, though, I don't think we should name it 2.4. We need to reserve the other 2.4-2.9 for *possible* enhancements to 2.3. Newnet, Qt, lua come to mind... I would rather see a branch called 3.0, so we can make a clear distinction about the higher system requirements that trunk uses over the current 2.x series. _______________________________________________ Warzone-dev mailing list [email protected] https://mail.gna.org/listinfo/warzone-dev
