On Wed, Apr 14, 2010 at 8:28 PM, buginator <buginato...@gmail.com> wrote: > That would work for me, though, I don't think we should name it 2.4. > We need to reserve the other 2.4-2.9 for *possible* enhancements to 2.3. > Newnet, Qt, lua come to mind... > > I would rather see a branch called 3.0, so we can make a clear > distinction about the higher system requirements that trunk uses over > the current 2.x series.
Yes, I agree; we should call it 3.0. -Zarel _______________________________________________ Warzone-dev mailing list Warzone-dev@gna.org https://mail.gna.org/listinfo/warzone-dev
