On Fri, Apr 23, 2010 at 1:12 PM, Stephen Swaney <[email protected]> wrote: > On Fri, Apr 23, 2010 at 10:51:41AM +0200, Per Inge Mathisen wrote: >> A release candidate should either be dropped back into beta, or stay >> in code freeze, which means nothing but build fixes, documentation >> changes or translations go in. Let's maintain some self-discipline now >> and ship this thing without further fixes. Then we can focus on making >> 2.3.1 and trunk great. > > Yeah, what he said. Code freeze, nothing but build fixes, doc changes > or translations. > > I think all but one of us has had enough of the endless series of > betas. It is not like this will be Last Release of WZ Ever. The > sooner we do this one, the sooner we can do the next. Let's try to do > it right for once, just for the novelty of it.
I agree, apart from perhaps a quick newnet+qt+lua2+C++-rewrite merge-backport, nothing should be committed to 2.3.0 other than build fixes, doc changes, a final balance fix to make mg penetrating and translations, and 2.3.0 should then be released as is and forgotten about. _______________________________________________ Warzone-dev mailing list [email protected] https://mail.gna.org/listinfo/warzone-dev
