On Wednesday, 19 May 2010 at 18:16, Ben wrote: > Just thought I could get your opinions on how I could change this for > the better. Zarel; you have your better screenshots, none of that :P
Here you go: First, personally I don't like hardcoded HTML tables and stuff, I'd prefer some light markup from which both HTML and PDF can be generated for maintainability. But then, who does the work decides on the tools. - You don't have an index.html as a starting point (in fact, you don't have any html files. DOS is dead, you know). - The logo is screwed up (http://www.abload.de/image.php?img=doc0181ur.png, corrupted file it seems), and scaled in the document (which a. might look worse than using a properly scaled down image, depending on the scaling the browser does, and b. needs useless space). - Centered text looks bad imo, especially with items (http://www.abload.de/image.php?img=doc0261zt.png), I'd prefer justified text. - Interface: "see XXX" isn't linked (maybe in other places as well). - Minimap: The view area is not always white. - Ordering units: Action and explanation don't always line up (http://www.abload.de/image.php?img=doc03c1yv.png), also there's a quite large gap that makes it a bit hard to see what belongs together. - Why not include the unit experience part as well instead of linking to the website? - The building screenshot is from 2.2, not 2.3. Well, I haven't looked that much at the later parts, just clicked through. My general impression is: The centered text is ugly, the navigation on the left takes up quite a bit of space that might be better used for the content (and with the hardcoded tables is also included when printing, where it is completely useless). But if the centered text (and the small stuff) at least is fixed, I wouldn't mind including it. _______________________________________________ Warzone-dev mailing list [email protected] https://mail.gna.org/listinfo/warzone-dev
