Christopher, Any contribution of time would be appreciated!
-rl Christopher K. St. John wrote: >>Ryan Lubke wrote: >>Christopher K. St. John wrote: >> >>> It would be nitfy to have GTest output in XML. >>> >>If you take a look at GTest, the original developers had started >>something like this. >> >>I've had intentions to work on this, but time hasn't permitted. >> >> > > I took a quick look. What's there can be activated by modifying (for > example) servlet-gtest.xml. Give the first watchdog test a new attribute: > > <watchdog request="..." > testName="DoFilterTest" debug="0" > ... > firstTask="true" > resultFileName="/home/cks/xxx.results.xml" > /> > > Make sure "resultFileName" comes _after_ "firstTask". You end up > with an ill-formed XML file, but you get something. > > Looks like it wouldn't be too hard to fix it up, main thing is writing a > filter for the output so the actual/golden listing doesn't contain any > xml-nasties like '<', etc. > > I don't have big blocks of time to devote to this, but I should be able > to grab an hour or two here and there over the next couple of weeks. > I'd just be fixing up what was there (keeping the dual resultOut/system.out > thing). Does that sound reasonable? > > -- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > > -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
