Thanks for trying it out. We appreciate your feedback. Please file the bugs that you encounter in the issue tracker here: http://code.google.com/p/wave-protocol/issues/
Groups will be very useful but they are not easy. I don't know the prospects of groups in Wave in a Box. Configuration was improved 3 months ago: https://groups.google.com/group/wave-protocol/msg/9584a26c608179d7 I was hoping that it was easy enough to navigate. No one is working on administrative oversight into all waves. It shouldn't be too difficult to do, depending on what you need. Any contributions in that area will be welcome. Soren On Tue, Mar 1, 2011 at 7:21 AM, Mumme, Joshua P <[email protected]> wrote: > > I have set up an internal wave in a box server for testing purposes. > It is… well very buggy unfortunately. It got some love but not enough > to be a contributing member of society. Is anyone still running with > this idea with newer more updated code? > > If so where do I go to find it or discuss with the fine folks writing it. > I have the current revisions per http://www.waveprotocol.org/wave-in-a-box. > > We are interested in possibly using this within our support team to help > foster international collaboration. But I wanted to ping you guys > because in the current state it is just.. almost there. > > Some functionality that would make it more viable for our use. > > > 1. Less bugs of course. > > 2. Groups within wave in a box. > > 3. Overarching and easier to navigate configuration. > > 4. Administrative oversight into all waves. > > Thank you! > > > Joshua Mumme > CA Technologies > Support Engineer > Tel: +214-473-1319 > [email protected] > >
