Hi, Is there a reason why "100% functionality" shouldn't be the target (well, of course more, but at least adding all the current features at some point)? Are these even documented to the issues so some interested party could take such an issue and create it at some point (even if current committers might see something irrelevant or non important at current state) ? Something like "wishlist" as JIRA version. At least it would guarantee that some features wouldn't be forgotten when eventually Google's Wave service would go down.
- Micke On Sat, Jan 22, 2011 at 9:39 PM, Matt Richards <[email protected]> wrote: > The idea is to eventually have WiaB become the suitable replacement. > While it will not have 100% functionality that Google's Wave had, the aim > is > to have it functional enough to be usable. > > On Sat, Jan 22, 2011 at 12:36 PM, Yuri Z <[email protected]> wrote: > > > A suitable replacement - imho - it would be a free Wiab instance hosted > by > > someone (or even several federating providers). Google did open almost > all > > relevant code and is also working on providing wave export utility so > > anyone > > would be able to export all his waves from Google Wave into any Wiab > > server. > > However, if you ask me, Wiab is not really close to production ready > > quality > > - some critical features still missing and there are probably a bunch of > > bugs that need to be fixed. So, my guess is that Google Wave would stay > up > > at least for one more year. > > > > 2011/1/22 Juan Chulilla <[email protected]> > > > > > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- > > > Hash: SHA1 > > > > > > Thank you, Yuri. I should have quote that help page, because it > > > motivated my question. What I find more interesting is this: > > > > > > > We wanted to let you know that we will keep wave.google.com running > > > > past December 31, 2010 until a suitable replacement to host all your > > > > waves is available > > > > > > What dou you think that "a suitable replacement" means exactly? While > > > Google don't opensource all Wave code, is it not possible to host waves > > > entirely, right? > > > > > > TIA > > > > > > Juan > > > > > > El 21/01/2011 23:49, Yuri Z escribió: > > > > You can learn more here - > > > > http://www.google.com/support/wave/bin/answer.py?answer=1083134 > > > > > > > > 2011/1/21 Juan Chulilla <[email protected]> > > > > > > > > D-Day was December 31th. What happened exactly? Maybe they are not > > going > > > > to close them? > > > > > > > > Maybe in this state wave is not a menace to gmail or docs anymore :S. > > > > Anyway, I don't want to risk real job in a Wave that can be closed > any > > > day. > > > > > > > > Best regards, > > > > > > > > Juan > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > - -- > > > +++++ > > > > > > Dr. Juan Luis Chulilla Cano > > > Director, Online and Offline, S.L. > > > Telf.: 91 1277356 > > > 650 461435 > > > Calle de la Paz, 8 - 28012 Madrid > > > > > > www.onlineandoffline.net > > > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- > > > Version: GnuPG v2.0.16 (MingW32) > > > Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/ > > > > > > iEYEARECAAYFAk07HgkACgkQQtxNUwO9+XjHWACfV/2w10pR2ypYrMFrs3Bj+Az9 > > > WvAAn0KLFSaOIQueKyzZaj5sG1IMeVl6 > > > =v2JY > > > -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- > > > > > > > > > -- > --Matt >
