Congratulations Yuri!! Chris Cox ∙ Co-founder 415.681.3665 ∙ [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> <http://www.twitter.com/beamstream> <http://www.linkedin.com/inviteFromProfile?from=profile&key=1228301&firstNam e=Chris&[email protected]> <file://localhost/skype/%20crizzcoxx>
From: Yuri Z <[email protected]> Reply-To: <[email protected]> Date: Wed, 2 Mar 2011 14:41:04 +0200 To: <[email protected]> Subject: Re: offtopic: You guys know why Google has not close their wave servers? > I guess it won't be 100% because Google Wave is partially dependent on > Google infrastructure which cannot be ported. On the other hand, WIAB might > have features that were never implemented in Google Wave. For example WIAB > has Inline-blip counter feature. WIAB is still a work in progress and > features are added almost daily, so it's a bit impractical to maintain a > list of "missing features". In general, the most important missing features > for now (IMO) are: > 1. Full text search. > 2. Public waves and groups. > 3. Roles for wave access (All, Read Only ect..) > 4. User profiles. > > If you think that missing features should be documented - please create > issues at: http://code.google.com/p/wave-protocol/issues (at the moment the > issues didn't move yet to Apache Jira). > Yuri > > 2011/3/2 Michael Burman <[email protected]> > >> Hi, >> >> Is there a reason why "100% functionality" shouldn't be the target (well, >> of >> course more, but at least adding all the current features at some point)? >> Are these even documented to the issues so some interested party could take >> such an issue and create it at some point (even if current committers might >> see something irrelevant or non important at current state) ? Something >> like >> "wishlist" as JIRA version. At least it would guarantee that some features >> wouldn't be forgotten when eventually Google's Wave service would go down. >> >> - Micke >> >> On Sat, Jan 22, 2011 at 9:39 PM, Matt Richards <[email protected]> >> wrote: >> >>> > The idea is to eventually have WiaB become the suitable replacement. >>> > While it will not have 100% functionality that Google's Wave had, the aim >>> > is >>> > to have it functional enough to be usable. >>> > >>> > On Sat, Jan 22, 2011 at 12:36 PM, Yuri Z <[email protected]> wrote: >>> > >>>> > > A suitable replacement - imho - it would be a free Wiab instance >>>> hosted >>> > by >>>> > > someone (or even several federating providers). Google did open almost >>> > all >>>> > > relevant code and is also working on providing wave export utility so >>>> > > anyone >>>> > > would be able to export all his waves from Google Wave into any Wiab >>>> > > server. >>>> > > However, if you ask me, Wiab is not really close to production ready >>>> > > quality >>>> > > - some critical features still missing and there are probably a bunch >> of >>>> > > bugs that need to be fixed. So, my guess is that Google Wave would stay >>> > up >>>> > > at least for one more year. >>>> > > >>>> > > 2011/1/22 Juan Chulilla <[email protected]> >>>> > > >>>>> > > > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- >>>>> > > > Hash: SHA1 >>>>> > > > >>>>> > > > Thank you, Yuri. I should have quote that help page, because it >>>>> > > > motivated my question. What I find more interesting is this: >>>>> > > > >>>>>> > > > > We wanted to let you know that we will keep >>>>>> wave.google.comrunning >>>>>> > > > > past December 31, 2010 until a suitable replacement to host all >> your >>>>>> > > > > waves is available >>>>> > > > >>>>> > > > What dou you think that "a suitable replacement" means exactly? While >>>>> > > > Google don't opensource all Wave code, is it not possible to host >> waves >>>>> > > > entirely, right? >>>>> > > > >>>>> > > > TIA >>>>> > > > >>>>> > > > Juan >>>>> > > > >>>>> > > > El 21/01/2011 23:49, Yuri Z escribió: >>>>>> > > > > You can learn more here - >>>>>> > > > > http://www.google.com/support/wave/bin/answer.py?answer=1083134 >>>>>> > > > > >>>>>> > > > > 2011/1/21 Juan Chulilla <[email protected]> >>>>>> > > > > >>>>>> > > > > D-Day was December 31th. What happened exactly? Maybe they are not >>>> > > going >>>>>> > > > > to close them? >>>>>> > > > > >>>>>> > > > > Maybe in this state wave is not a menace to gmail or docs anymore >> :S. >>>>>> > > > > Anyway, I don't want to risk real job in a Wave that can be closed >>> > any >>>>> > > > day. >>>>>> > > > > >>>>>> > > > > Best regards, >>>>>> > > > > >>>>>> > > > > Juan >>>>>> > > > > >>>>>>> > > > >> >>>>> > > > >>>>> > > > - -- >>>>> > > > +++++ >>>>> > > > >>>>> > > > Dr. Juan Luis Chulilla Cano >>>>> > > > Director, Online and Offline, S.L. >>>>> > > > Telf.: 91 1277356 >>>>> > > > 650 461435 >>>>> > > > Calle de la Paz, 8 - 28012 Madrid >>>>> > > > >>>>> > > > www.onlineandoffline.net >>>>> > > > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- >>>>> > > > Version: GnuPG v2.0.16 (MingW32) >>>>> > > > Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/ >>>>> > > > >>>>> > > > iEYEARECAAYFAk07HgkACgkQQtxNUwO9+XjHWACfV/2w10pR2ypYrMFrs3Bj+Az9 >>>>> > > > WvAAn0KLFSaOIQueKyzZaj5sG1IMeVl6 >>>>> > > > =v2JY >>>>> > > > -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- >>>>> > > > >>>> > > >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> > -- >>> > --Matt >>> > >> >
