anyone? i propose to reup the http://www.waveprotocol.org/
On Sat, Apr 30, 2011 at 7:51 AM, Adrian Cochrane <[email protected]> wrote: > Hello WiAB, > > As a separate server project manager, I have some ideas (not for version > 1.0) and questions on Wave protocols. > > Firstly, I am not clear how deltas are sent in the Federation Protocol > (assuming, as I very much hope, it makes it into 1.0). Can someone > clarify how those deltas are formatted. > > Secondly, when I looked over Google's tutorials for the Simple Data > Protocol and gadgets, it struck me that they could better accommodate > offline clients, and the Wave This and embedding APIs were highly > centralized. So I've designed a plain TCP/IP alternative to Simple Data > Protocol using the same concepts, a simpler standard for Gadgets (which > does not need browser integration), and a URL scheme (which I think is > similar to yours) for embedding. Not wanting these to be proprietary, I > will share them if I get some interest. > > Again I am not proposing for release 1.0. I must also say I do not seek > to insult these protocols with what I said, because they are superb and > everything can be improved. > > Thirdly, I think that there should be a better place to discuss > protocols, and read up on them, which ideally would be decentralized > just like IETF and W3C. Again this is no ones fault for not needing it > at the point, but if there's me and you, it'll be great to have a > standards organization to encourage others. > -- > [email protected] > > -- > http://www.fastmail.fm - Or how I learned to stop worrying and > love email again > >
