I would definitely lend a hand in this, after all it is in my interest. -- [email protected]
On Sat, 30 Apr 2011 18:06 -0700, "Michael MacFadden" <[email protected]> wrote: > It has been the intention since the beginning that as the WiaB project > moves to apache that the protocol would stay with waveprotocol.org. > Admittedly it has been taking longer to migrate to Apache than we had > planned. We are actually picking up some steam now. I would highly > encourage anyone who is interested to ask to lend a hand on the wave > protocol site. However, there is still a lot of WiaB content that needs > to be pulled over in to the apache wave project. > > ~Michael > > > On Apr 30, 2011, at 5:48 PM, ya knygar wrote: > > > anyone? > > i propose to reup the http://www.waveprotocol.org/ > > > > On Sat, Apr 30, 2011 at 7:51 AM, Adrian Cochrane <[email protected]> wrote: > >> Hello WiAB, > >> > >> As a separate server project manager, I have some ideas (not for version > >> 1.0) and questions on Wave protocols. > >> > >> Firstly, I am not clear how deltas are sent in the Federation Protocol > >> (assuming, as I very much hope, it makes it into 1.0). Can someone > >> clarify how those deltas are formatted. > >> > >> Secondly, when I looked over Google's tutorials for the Simple Data > >> Protocol and gadgets, it struck me that they could better accommodate > >> offline clients, and the Wave This and embedding APIs were highly > >> centralized. So I've designed a plain TCP/IP alternative to Simple Data > >> Protocol using the same concepts, a simpler standard for Gadgets (which > >> does not need browser integration), and a URL scheme (which I think is > >> similar to yours) for embedding. Not wanting these to be proprietary, I > >> will share them if I get some interest. > >> > >> Again I am not proposing for release 1.0. I must also say I do not seek > >> to insult these protocols with what I said, because they are superb and > >> everything can be improved. > >> > >> Thirdly, I think that there should be a better place to discuss > >> protocols, and read up on them, which ideally would be decentralized > >> just like IETF and W3C. Again this is no ones fault for not needing it > >> at the point, but if there's me and you, it'll be great to have a > >> standards organization to encourage others. > >> -- > >> [email protected] > >> > >> -- > >> http://www.fastmail.fm - Or how I learned to stop worrying and > >> love email again > >> > >> > -- http://www.fastmail.fm - Accessible with your email software or over the web
