Well, I think JSP or JSF makes more sense than Velocity, but I don't think
we have a real need to switch. I also struggled with GXP when using it for
the first time, but when you get used you start to like its advantages.

2011/5/15 Lennard de Rijk <[email protected]>

> On Sat, May 14, 2011 at 17:45, Michael MacFadden <
> [email protected]> wrote:
>
> > I have heard many comments from new developers on wave who were trying to
> > modify or add these kinds of pages struggling with figuring out how to
> use
> > GXP.  I guess this is in part due to the lack of documentation.  Is GXP
> > widely used outside of Google?  I had not heard of it until I got
> involved
> > with WiaB.
> >
> >
> Afaik not. Django is very popular but requires Python based projects :).
> I'm
> not sure what is often used for Java.
>
> Greetings,
> Lennard
>
>
> > ~Michael
> >
> > On May 14, 2011, at 4:31 PM, James Purser wrote:
> >
> > > I can +1 the bit about poor documentation
> > >
> > > On Sat, May 14, 2011 at 2:54 AM, Yuri Z <[email protected]> wrote:
> > >
> > >> I think that the main advantage is that GXP verifies the HTML so it
> > ensures
> > >> that if gxp templates compiles then the HTML is valid. Also it is more
> > >> secure.
> > >> The greatest issue with GXP is very poor documentation.
> > >> 2011/5/13 Michael MacFadden <[email protected]>
> > >>
> > >>> All,
> > >>>
> > >>> I am not advocating a change at all, just looking for some info...
> > >>>
> > >>> I noticed that we use the Google XML Pages (GXP) technology for some
> of
> > >> the
> > >>> UI in WiaB.  I understand why you would want to use a template based
> > >>> solution rather than raw servlest writing HTML.  I also know what the
> > >>> benefits are over traditional JSP pages.
> > >>>
> > >>> However, what are the advantages of GXP over something like Apache
> > >>> Velocity?  Just looking to understand.   Thanks.
> > >>>
> > >>>
> > >>> ~Michael
> > >>
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > --
> > > James Purser
> > > Collaborynth
> > > http://collaborynth.com.au
> > > Mob: +61 406 576 553
> > > Wave: [email protected]
> >
> >
>

Reply via email to