Hmm, just tried to run the ClientFrontendImplTest and all tests passed for
me... Strange. I ll try to investigate it.

On Sun, Aug 28, 2011 at 5:55 PM, Ruxiao Ma <m...@hcc.im> wrote:

> Now recloning the repo to get a clean copy.
>
> But what about those testing errors? without manually disabling that test I
> can't even compile it...
>
> On Sun, Aug 28, 2011 at 22:52, Yuri Z <vega...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > Try to clean the browse rcache.
> >
> > On Sun, Aug 28, 2011 at 5:49 PM, Ruxiao Ma <m...@hcc.im> wrote:
> >
> > > Update:
> > >
> > > Went back to 1018 , no more test errors, but still get turbulence.
> > >
> > > Went back to 1015, still can't get it running.
> > >
> > > Got lots of DBUG::EOF org.eclipse.jetty.io.EofException in the output.
> > >
> > > Since there is no xorg on the server, I've bound the server to
> > > 0.0.0.0:9898to access it.
> > >
> > > I'm confused because I've managed to get it running several months ago.
> I
> > > don't know why I can't run it now(looks like others don't have this
> > > problem).
> > >
> > > On Sun, Aug 28, 2011 at 21:10, Ruxiao Ma <m...@hcc.im> wrote:
> > >
> > > > Hi everyone,
> > > >
> > > > I've pulled the tip and tried to compile it on Ubuntu Server 10.04.3
> > > amd64
> > > > but it always fail on tests.
> > > >
> > > > In test_out it says:
> > > >
> > > > Argument(s) are different! Wanted: openListener.onUpdate( <Capturing
> > > > argument>, isNull(), [DeltaSequence empty], isNull(), true, isNull()
> );
> > > ->
> > > > at
> > > >
> > >
> >
> org.waveprotocol.box.server.frontend.ClientFrontendImplTest.verifyMarker(ClientFrontendImplTest.java:346)
> > > > Actual invocation has different arguments: openListener.onUpdate(
> > > > [WaveletName example.com/waveId/example.com/dummy+root], null,
> > > > [DeltaSequence empty], null, true, "ch1" ); -> at
> > > >
> > >
> >
> org.waveprotocol.box.server.frontend.ClientFrontendImpl.openRequest(ClientFrontendImpl.java:224)
> > > >
> > > > Argument(s) are different! Wanted:
> > > > openListener.onUpdate(
> > > > ,
> > > > isNull(),
> > > > [DeltaSequence empty],
> > > > isNull(),
> > > > true,
> > > > isNull()
> > > > );
> > > > -> at
> > > >
> > >
> >
> org.waveprotocol.box.server.frontend.ClientFrontendImplTest.verifyMarker(ClientFrontendImplTest.java:346)
> > > > Actual invocation has different arguments:
> > > > openListener.onUpdate(
> > > > [WaveletName example.com/waveId/example.com/dummy+root],
> > > > null,
> > > > [DeltaSequence empty],
> > > > null,
> > > > true,
> > > > "ch1"
> > > > );
> > > > -> at
> > > >
> > >
> >
> org.waveprotocol.box.server.frontend.ClientFrontendImpl.openRequest(ClientFrontendImpl.java:224)
> > > >
> > > > at
> > > >
> > >
> >
> org.waveprotocol.box.server.frontend.ClientFrontendImplTest.verifyMarker(ClientFrontendImplTest.java:346)
> > > > at
> > > >
> > >
> >
> org.waveprotocol.box.server.frontend.ClientFrontendImplTest.testOpenEmptyWaveReceivesChannelIdAndMarker(ClientFrontendImplTest.java:133)
> > > >
> > > > and so on. If I skip this test, wiab won't run correctly, I can log
> in
> > > but
> > > > can't get my status to Online and keep getting turbulence.
> > > >
> > > > Now I'm trying to build on an 32-bit machine to see if it works.
> > > >
> > > > @James Purser, I'm not subscribed so I can't directly reply your mail
> > but
> > > > yes, I think we got same errors.
> > > >
> > >
> >
>

Reply via email to