I just verified that this test fails for me also. On Aug 28, 2011, at 8:59 AM, Yuri Z wrote:
> Hmm, just tried to run the ClientFrontendImplTest and all tests passed for > me... Strange. I ll try to investigate it. > > On Sun, Aug 28, 2011 at 5:55 PM, Ruxiao Ma <m...@hcc.im> wrote: > >> Now recloning the repo to get a clean copy. >> >> But what about those testing errors? without manually disabling that test I >> can't even compile it... >> >> On Sun, Aug 28, 2011 at 22:52, Yuri Z <vega...@gmail.com> wrote: >> >>> Try to clean the browse rcache. >>> >>> On Sun, Aug 28, 2011 at 5:49 PM, Ruxiao Ma <m...@hcc.im> wrote: >>> >>>> Update: >>>> >>>> Went back to 1018 , no more test errors, but still get turbulence. >>>> >>>> Went back to 1015, still can't get it running. >>>> >>>> Got lots of DBUG::EOF org.eclipse.jetty.io.EofException in the output. >>>> >>>> Since there is no xorg on the server, I've bound the server to >>>> 0.0.0.0:9898to access it. >>>> >>>> I'm confused because I've managed to get it running several months ago. >> I >>>> don't know why I can't run it now(looks like others don't have this >>>> problem). >>>> >>>> On Sun, Aug 28, 2011 at 21:10, Ruxiao Ma <m...@hcc.im> wrote: >>>> >>>>> Hi everyone, >>>>> >>>>> I've pulled the tip and tried to compile it on Ubuntu Server 10.04.3 >>>> amd64 >>>>> but it always fail on tests. >>>>> >>>>> In test_out it says: >>>>> >>>>> Argument(s) are different! Wanted: openListener.onUpdate( <Capturing >>>>> argument>, isNull(), [DeltaSequence empty], isNull(), true, isNull() >> ); >>>> -> >>>>> at >>>>> >>>> >>> >> org.waveprotocol.box.server.frontend.ClientFrontendImplTest.verifyMarker(ClientFrontendImplTest.java:346) >>>>> Actual invocation has different arguments: openListener.onUpdate( >>>>> [WaveletName example.com/waveId/example.com/dummy+root], null, >>>>> [DeltaSequence empty], null, true, "ch1" ); -> at >>>>> >>>> >>> >> org.waveprotocol.box.server.frontend.ClientFrontendImpl.openRequest(ClientFrontendImpl.java:224) >>>>> >>>>> Argument(s) are different! Wanted: >>>>> openListener.onUpdate( >>>>> , >>>>> isNull(), >>>>> [DeltaSequence empty], >>>>> isNull(), >>>>> true, >>>>> isNull() >>>>> ); >>>>> -> at >>>>> >>>> >>> >> org.waveprotocol.box.server.frontend.ClientFrontendImplTest.verifyMarker(ClientFrontendImplTest.java:346) >>>>> Actual invocation has different arguments: >>>>> openListener.onUpdate( >>>>> [WaveletName example.com/waveId/example.com/dummy+root], >>>>> null, >>>>> [DeltaSequence empty], >>>>> null, >>>>> true, >>>>> "ch1" >>>>> ); >>>>> -> at >>>>> >>>> >>> >> org.waveprotocol.box.server.frontend.ClientFrontendImpl.openRequest(ClientFrontendImpl.java:224) >>>>> >>>>> at >>>>> >>>> >>> >> org.waveprotocol.box.server.frontend.ClientFrontendImplTest.verifyMarker(ClientFrontendImplTest.java:346) >>>>> at >>>>> >>>> >>> >> org.waveprotocol.box.server.frontend.ClientFrontendImplTest.testOpenEmptyWaveReceivesChannelIdAndMarker(ClientFrontendImplTest.java:133) >>>>> >>>>> and so on. If I skip this test, wiab won't run correctly, I can log >> in >>>> but >>>>> can't get my status to Online and keep getting turbulence. >>>>> >>>>> Now I'm trying to build on an 32-bit machine to see if it works. >>>>> >>>>> @James Purser, I'm not subscribed so I can't directly reply your mail >>> but >>>>> yes, I think we got same errors. >>>>> >>>> >>> >>
