Hi Micheal, Sorry to confuse you. WIth client I actually meant the implementation of a robot. Where as the server is the part handling the operations a robot wants to apply. The com.google.wave.api package is the actual code that was handed out to robot developers :). Does this make more sense now?
- Lennard On Tue, Jun 26, 2012 at 7:21 AM, Michael MacFadden < [email protected]> wrote: > Lennard, > > Just a quick question. It doesn't seem like the com.google.wave.api > package is used anywhere in the client. Doing a reference search in > eclipse shows that it is only used by the org.waveprotocol.box.server.xxx > packages. Am I missing something? > > ~Michael > > On Jun 25, 2012, at 6:10 PM, Lennard de Rijk wrote: > > > Looks good to me. I was unable to find the edit button but I'd like to > make > > the following edit: > > > > com.google.wave.api Shared classes between the client and server > > implementation of the Robot and Data APIs. > > > > - Lennard > > > > On Mon, Jun 25, 2012 at 3:28 PM, Michael MacFadden < > > [email protected]> wrote: > > > >> All, > >> > >> In an attempt to build a sensible maven structure and to start to > document > >> our code base, I have started working up the following table: > >> > >> > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/WAVE/Source+Code+Organization > >> > >> If people can review and comment that would be great. > >> > >> ~Michael > >
