I agree, IMO efforts should be directed at getting more man power. Sadly, ideas are mostly useless if there's no hands that will transform them into actual code. I don't know... a solid business plan for a kickstarter, some advertising magic that will attract developers to devote their time for free, convince the public to donate copious amounts of money to the project (this was attempted by the now-offline fundwiab <http://www.fundwiab.com/> initiative, but it only managed to collect maybe 20 hours worth of developer time; too little to do any medium sized task), etc.
On Thu, May 30, 2013 at 6:40 AM, Angus Turner <[email protected]> wrote: > Nothing about it not being appropriate, everything about having the man > power. Right now it's hard enough to maintain the code we've got. > > I personally would rather wave was written in a 'nice' language like JS or > Python, but right now it's not worth the effort. > > Thanks > Angus Turner > [email protected] > > > On Thu, May 30, 2013 at 12:53 PM, John Blossom <[email protected]> wrote: > > > Hello, > > > > Looking through some documentation on Wave-derived products, I am seeing > > that there is some good use of Node.JS coding for server-side functions. > > Why would it not be appropriate to replace some or all of the demo-model > > code from Google on the server side with a light and powerful language > such > > as this? > > > > Good analysis of Node performance at: http://nodejs.org/jsconf2010.pdf > > > > Thanks for your feedback, > > > > John > > > -- Saludos, Bruno González _______________________________________________ Jabber: stenyak AT gmail.com http://www.stenyak.com
