Note I'd be willing to set all this up if someone can give me write access to the wave-protocol site...
Thanks Angus Turner [email protected] On Tue, Jun 4, 2013 at 8:39 AM, Angus Turner <[email protected]> wrote: > In moving over all the stuff to the wiki I left the protocol specs and the > whitepapers on the protocol website. Maybe we need someone with commit > access to that site to leave all the protocol stuff up and delete the rest, > and create a github repo or something to host the build files. > > Thanks > Angus Turner > [email protected] > > > On Tue, Jun 4, 2013 at 8:32 AM, Ali Lown <[email protected]> wrote: > >> Yes, we can move spec/ and whitepapers/ to the website if that is better. >> >> You might want to consider how they sat on the waveprotocol site >> (along with some other documents not included in spec/whitepapers): >> http://www.waveprotocol.org/protocol. >> (And whether we should have those other documents on the site as well?) >> >> Ali >> >> On 3 June 2013 23:29, Angus Turner <[email protected]> wrote: >> > Wasn't sure if I was going to include removing the white paper folders >> > yet. Just a sudden brainwave. Can we include those folders in the >> > website repo? >> > >> > Sent from my Windows Phone >> > From: Ali Lown >> > Sent: 4/06/2013 7:40 AM >> > To: Angus Turner; Ali Lown; wave >> > Subject: Re: Review Request: Removes requestreview >> > >> > ----------------------------------------------------------- >> > This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: >> > https://reviews.apache.org/r/11609/#review21362 >> > ----------------------------------------------------------- >> > >> > Ship it! >> > >> > >> > Thanks for this, though you didn't really need to file a >> > review-request for since, since I was just going to do it when I next >> > went to work on the release. >> > >> > - Ali Lown >> > >> > >> > On June 3, 2013, 9:21 p.m., Angus Turner wrote: >> >> >> >> ----------------------------------------------------------- >> >> This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: >> >> https://reviews.apache.org/r/11609/ >> >> ----------------------------------------------------------- >> >> >> >> (Updated June 3, 2013, 9:21 p.m.) >> >> >> >> >> >> Review request for wave. >> >> >> >> >> >> Description >> >> ------- >> >> >> >> Removes requestreview as per mailing list discussion. >> >> >> >> >> >> Diffs >> >> ----- >> >> >> >> /request_codereview 1489182 >> >> >> >> Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/11609/diff/ >> >> >> >> >> >> Testing >> >> ------- >> >> >> >> n/a >> >> >> >> >> >> Thanks, >> >> >> >> Angus Turner >> >> >> >> >> > >
