That does seem to be the one that's referenced in the rights page. I am not sure where they stand in clarifying the rights ownership transfer with Google, but either way it seems to be the right one.
All the best, John Blossom at 6:20 AM, Yuri Z <[email protected]> wrote: > Yep, I think we have rights only for the open wave logo. > > > On Tue, Jun 4, 2013 at 12:38 PM, Angus Turner <[email protected]> > wrote: > > > I know for sure we have the rights for the Open Wave one, not sure about > > the wiab. I personally think we should go for the openwave, and can add > the > > trademark to it if needed. > > > > Thanks > > Angus Turner > > [email protected] > > > > > > On Tue, Jun 4, 2013 at 7:35 PM, Ali Lown <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > Christian has raised the point that we need to attach 'Trademark' to > > > the wave logo before we can release. > > > > > > We seem to be using a different logo in the project to the one on the > > > website: > > > > > > > > > https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/wave/branches/wave-0.4-release/war/static/logo.png > > > https://incubator.apache.org/wave/images/OpenWaveLogo.png > > > > > > Which of these should we be using going forward? (Presumably the Open > > > Wave logo?) (Do we have rights over the wave-in-a-box one?) > > > > > > Comments? > > > > > > Ali > > > > > >
