How about platform@ ? On Jun 5, 2013 4:59 PM, "Upayavira" <u...@odoko.co.uk> wrote:
> Except, this isn't for users of WIAB, it is for general discussion about > Wave, so user@ doesn't really fit. There are other general@ lists, so > there's precedence there. > > The other issue though, is that mailing lists work when there's a shared > project to discuss. I'm not yet clear what the shared project is that > would be discussed on the general@ list - what the shared goal would be. > > I'd say let's continue the conversations for a while longer, and when > the time comes, I can create the list (I have the necessary karma). > > Upayavira > > On Wed, Jun 5, 2013, at 08:51 PM, Ed - 0x1b, Inc. wrote: > > On Wed, Jun 5, 2013 at 12:09 PM, Christian Grobmeier > > <grobme...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > On Wed, Jun 5, 2013 at 8:41 PM, Ali Lown <a...@lown.me.uk> wrote: > > >> Following on from the talk, if we intend to develop Apache Wave as an > > >> end-product focused project, we should probably migrate talks of > > >> 'visions' and 'community' to a separate mailing list from to allow > > >> wave-dev to be kept as a developer list related to work on the > > >> code-base and documentation. > > >> > > >> How about would people feel about a wave-general list for the non-dev > > >> focused discussions? > > > > > > Sure, we can give it a try. > > > Other apache projects usually have wave-user@ (later to be renamed to > > > u...@wave.apache.org) > > > > > > > +1 > > > > > General would be ok too. But I think user would be better, as it > > > follows old patterns. If there is a need to for example discuss the > > > protocol later and the users list is getting to much traffic it could > > > be separated once more. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> Ali > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > > http://www.grobmeier.de > > > https://www.timeandbill.de >
