On Wed, Jun 5, 2013 at 3:23 PM, John Blossom <jblos...@gmail.com> wrote: > How about platform@ ? > On Jun 5, 2013 4:59 PM, "Upayavira" <u...@odoko.co.uk> wrote: > >> Except, this isn't for users of WIAB, it is for general discussion about >> Wave, so user@ doesn't really fit. There are other general@ lists, so >> there's precedence there.
your trying to fit the wrong way - do what the other projects have done so that the unfamiliar face less of a barrier to enter into the world of Wave. >> >> The other issue though, is that mailing lists work when there's a shared >> project to discuss. I'm not yet clear what the shared project is that >> would be discussed on the general@ list - what the shared goal would be. how about "how one uses Wave" vs "Conversations about Developing Wave softwares" The whole idea is to weed the dev@ list of OT threads by giving them a place to be. Just do it and see what shows up. it will be good. >> >> I'd say let's continue the conversations for a while longer, and when >> the time comes, I can create the list (I have the necessary karma). >> >> Upayavira thanks >> >> On Wed, Jun 5, 2013, at 08:51 PM, Ed - 0x1b, Inc. wrote: >> > On Wed, Jun 5, 2013 at 12:09 PM, Christian Grobmeier >> > <grobme...@gmail.com> wrote: >> > > On Wed, Jun 5, 2013 at 8:41 PM, Ali Lown <a...@lown.me.uk> wrote: >> > >> Following on from the talk, if we intend to develop Apache Wave as an >> > >> end-product focused project, we should probably migrate talks of >> > >> 'visions' and 'community' to a separate mailing list from to allow >> > >> wave-dev to be kept as a developer list related to work on the >> > >> code-base and documentation. >> > >> >> > >> How about would people feel about a wave-general list for the non-dev >> > >> focused discussions? >> > > >> > > Sure, we can give it a try. >> > > Other apache projects usually have wave-user@ (later to be renamed to >> > > u...@wave.apache.org) >> > > >> > >> > +1 >> > >> > > General would be ok too. But I think user would be better, as it >> > > follows old patterns. If there is a need to for example discuss the >> > > protocol later and the users list is getting to much traffic it could >> > > be separated once more. >> > > >> > > >> > > >> > > >> > >> Ali >> > > >> > > >> > > >> > > -- >> > > http://www.grobmeier.de >> > > https://www.timeandbill.de >>
