Personally, I'd say do anything that helps people work. The release is important in Apache terms, but right now, we're looking at how to have a community at all. A release with no community to back it wouldn't give the world much.
So, if folks think that Mavenization helps, and will ease development, then go for it, I say. Upayavira On Mon, Dec 2, 2013, at 01:46 AM, Michael MacFadden wrote: > I would still be more than happy to press through the mavenization, but > it > seemed like people were some what against the idea until we got the > release out the door historically. > > Thoughts? > > On 12/1/13, 5:37 PM, "Frank R." <renfeng...@gmail.com> wrote: > > >It'll get slim once mavenized. > > > > > >On Mon, Dec 2, 2013 at 6:06 AM, Angus Turner <angusisf...@gmail.com> > >wrote: > > > >> It is quite a large repo :) > >> > >> Thanks > >> Angus Turner > >> angusisf...@gmail.com > >> > >> > >> > >> On Mon, Dec 2, 2013 at 9:05 AM, Thomas Wrobel <darkfl...@gmail.com> > >>wrote: > >> > >> > No problem, at the moment its still checking out. > >> > I'll note down any other issues other then those two as I get any. > >> > (Actually still on WindowsXP here ;) ) > >> > > >> > ~~~ > >> > Thomas & Bertines online review show: > >> > http://randomreviewshow.com/index.html > >> > Try it! You might even feel ambivalent about it :) > >> > > >> > > >> > On 1 December 2013 23:02, Angus Turner <angusisf...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> > > >> > > Or a wave ;) > >> > > On a more serious note this is something that needs doing - and > >> something > >> > > I've been meaning to do for a while. Start with a clean slate on > >>each > >> > major > >> > > OS (Mac OSX, Ubuntu, Win8 and possibly WinXP) and write down exactly > >> what > >> > > needs doing or what errors come up. > >> > > > >> > > If you begin to do this it'd be great to document it somewhere like > >>the > >> > > wiki.. > >> > > > >> > > Thanks > >> > > Angus Turner > >> > > angusisf...@gmail.com > >> > > > >> > > > >> > > > >> > > On Mon, Dec 2, 2013 at 8:58 AM, Thomas Wrobel <darkfl...@gmail.com> > >> > wrote: > >> > > > >> > > > or....a wave? ;) > >> > > > It is sort-of on-topic to the earlier discussion as to "how to get > >> more > >> > > > activity". But yes, it might be getting too sidetracked. > >> > > > > >> > > > > >> > > > > >> > > > ~~~ > >> > > > Thomas & Bertines online review show: > >> > > > http://randomreviewshow.com/index.html > >> > > > Try it! You might even feel ambivalent about it :) > >> > > > > >> > > > > >> > > > On 1 December 2013 22:46, Angus Turner <angusisf...@gmail.com> > >> wrote: > >> > > > > >> > > > > A wiki page or a new thread might be better for this - kind of > >>off > >> > > > topic... > >> > > > > > >> > > > > Thanks > >> > > > > Angus Turner > >> > > > > angusisf...@gmail.com > >> > > > > > >> > > > > > >> > > > > > >> > > > > On Mon, Dec 2, 2013 at 8:34 AM, Thomas Wrobel > >><darkfl...@gmail.com > >> > > >> > > > wrote: > >> > > > > > >> > > > > > ok, svn checkout; > >> > > > > > > >> > > > > > Note #1: Get an > >> > > > > > "Error validating server certificate for > >> > https://svn.apache.org:443: > >> > > > > > Unknown certificate issuer. > >> > > > > > Fingerprint: > >> > > > bc:5f:40:92:fd:6a:49:aa:f8:b8:35:0d:ed:27:5e:a6:64:c1:7a:1b > >> > > > > > Thawte, Inc., US" > >> > > > > > > >> > > > > > I accept once and proceed. > >> > > > > > > >> > > > > > (I am just documenting anything that might put people off > >>getting > >> > > > > started) > >> > > > > > > >> > > > > > > >> > > > > > > >> > > > > > > >> > > > > > > >> > > > > > ~~~ > >> > > > > > Thomas & Bertines online review show: > >> > > > > > http://randomreviewshow.com/index.html > >> > > > > > Try it! You might even feel ambivalent about it :) > >> > > > > > > >> > > > > > > >> > > > > > On 1 December 2013 22:26, Thomas Wrobel <darkfl...@gmail.com> > >> > wrote: > >> > > > > > > >> > > > > > > cheers :) > >> > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > ~~~ > >> > > > > > > Thomas & Bertines online review show: > >> > > > > > > http://randomreviewshow.com/index.html > >> > > > > > > Try it! You might even feel ambivalent about it :) > >> > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > On 1 December 2013 21:35, Yuri Z <vega...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> > > > > > > > >> > > > > > >> The latest source code: > >> > > > > > >> http://incubator.apache.org/wave/source-code.html > >> > > > > > >> > >> > > > > > >> > >> > > > > > >> On Sun, Dec 1, 2013 at 8:19 PM, Thomas Wrobel < > >> > > darkfl...@gmail.com> > >> > > > > > >> wrote: > >> > > > > > >> > >> > > > > > >> > On 29 November 2013 16:05, Fleeky Flanco > >><fle...@gmail.com> > >> > > > wrote: > >> > > > > > >> > > >> > > > > > >> > > > >> > > > > > >> > >> > > > > > >> > > > >> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/WAVE/Building+Wave+in+a+Box > >> > > > > > >> > > > >> > > > > > >> > > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/WAVE/Home > >> > > > > > >> > > > >> > > > > > >> > > also there is #wiab on irc.freenode.net > >> > > > > > >> > > >> > > > > > >> > > >> > > > > > >> > > >> > > > > > >> > Ok, trying to follow this guide to setup for client > >> > development. > >> > > > > > >> > > >> > > > > > >> > Stuck #1; > >> > > > > > >> > > >> > > > > > >> > Wheres the latest source? > >> > > > > > >> > > >> > > > > > >> > >> > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > >> > > > > > >> > > > > >> > > > >> > > >> > >
