Hi guys, This paragraph caught my eye:
Currently with the project patches and issues aren't given enough attention > due to the lack of manpower. However actions can be taken to smooth this > process as listed below I'm not a developer, but perhaps I can help out in this area? I've done some DevOps/Automation work with Chef and Jenkins. PS. Long time lurker, but big fan of Wave. -Jonathan Leong On Thu, Mar 10, 2016 at 6:39 PM, Michael MacFadden < michael.macfad...@gmail.com> wrote: > Something that got lost in that translation was, if we were going to go > down the path you are considering, I would be interested in the OT > subsystem and the protocol. The main reason I have not been contributing > much is simply because we aren’t doing much in those areas. > > > > > On 3/10/16, 6:37 PM, "Michael MacFadden" <michael.macfad...@gmail.com> > wrote: > > >Looking over the doc is a good start, I think we could codify some > additional things or principles that we would want to account for. > > > >Personally, my expertise lies in the OT system and the client to server > messaging. Both in the implementation and in the “why/how” of what is > there now. > > > >One thing I would say is that the Client’s data model / rendering > approach is fairly sophisticated in two regards. First building any sort > of rich text editor in the browser is some what difficult. I am not sure > that undertaking that particular effort, GWT or otherwise is going to be > easy. The rest of the UI could be easily redone quickly, but the editor > would take months and months to do from scratch. I think we would want to > consider if we should be looking at using an existing editor that is out > there. > > > >The other area where the UI is complex is in the performance aspect of > it. The wave UI is designed to load a ton of “blips”. The content over > time could become very, very long. There was some measure of thought put > into the current system to make rendering and eventing very fast to handle > large conversations. > > > >Just a few thoughts. > > > >~Michael > > > > > > > > > >On 3/10/16, 4:34 PM, "Thomas Wrobel" <darkfl...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > >>As always +1 to separation (speaking as a GWT person not having a clue > >>how the server works). > >>-- > >>http://lostagain.nl <-- our company site. > >>http://fanficmaker.com <-- our, really,really, bad story generator. > >> > >> > >>On 10 March 2016 at 14:32, Evan Hughes <wisebald...@apache.org> wrote: > >>> Hell all, > >>> > >>> please see the attached document for my own personal vision for the > future > >>> of wave, > >>> > >>> > https://docs.google.com/document/d/1YnhcupFtReZyq5Y5QheIbYFO2epEhXGucNZE04r_oA4/edit?usp=sharing > >>> > >>> > >>> Happy to receive any thoughts on any of the changes. > >>> > >>> Sincerely, > >>> Evan Hughes > > > >
