On Sat, Sep 05, 2009 at 10:35:10AM +1000, Brian May wrote: > I previously had the alternative suggestion that keeping copies of the data > (including history) might be best done at the database level.
This is confusing the way I wrote this, it wasn't a suggestion I made, it was a suggestion made to me by James Purser. See <http://groups.google.com/group/wave-protocol/browse_thread/thread/bd0f44facefdfcf9/638e7d68ac0cd752?lnk=gst&q=restart#638e7d68ac0cd752>. There is also a wave that discusses this issue on Sandbox (wavesandbox.com!w+rrhrd9GL%E), apparently copied somewhere from <http://blog.wavenz.com/>. -- Brian May <[email protected]> --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Wave Protocol" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/wave-protocol?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
