>> I previously had the alternative suggestion that keeping copies of the data >> (including history) might be best done at the database level. > > This is confusing the way I wrote this, it wasn't a suggestion I made, it was > a > suggestion made to me by James Purser. > > See > <http://groups.google.com/group/wave-protocol/browse_thread/thread/bd0f44facefdfcf9/638e7d68ac0cd752?lnk=gst&q=restart#638e7d68ac0cd752>. > > There is also a wave that discusses this issue on Sandbox > (wavesandbox.com!w+rrhrd9GL%E), apparently copied somewhere from > <http://blog.wavenz.com/>.
Yes, the FedOne server doesn't do persistence right now. That's something I plan to remedy. Though I might not be able to share it if I can't approval form my employer. As for the wavesandbox reference, unfortunately, I don't yet have a wavesandbox account :-( -Tad --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Wave Protocol" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/wave-protocol?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
