On Fri, Oct 2, 2009 at 4:48 AM, Peter Saint-Andre <[email protected]>wrote:
> > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- > Hash: SHA1 > > On 7/28/09 1:23 AM, Anthony Baxter wrote: > > So what comments do people have on v 0.2 of the spec. I agree that the > > certificate query/push needs to stop using pubsub, and switch to a raw > > iq set/get/result. Other than that, are there any issues? > > Here are some comments... > > 1. wavelets > > You mention that a user-data wavelet has the user as the only > participant. Have you thought about instances where the user-data > wavelet might be changeable by an authorized person such as a personal > assistant? > > 2. wavelet name format > > Perhaps add a note about characters that need to be escaped in XML > attributes. > > 3. wavelet update > > Why use message stanzas here with receipts (XEP-0184)? It seems that you > really want IQs, and the next version of the pubsub spec will have a > node configuration option for delivery of pubsub notifications via IQs. > The use of IQ seems especially appropriate since the entities involved > are wave servers with stable addresses. > > 4. history request/response > > Is the literal NodeID "wavelet" hardcoded? > > The example for returning the requested history is missing the NodeID > and ItemIDs (also true for some later examples, let's fill these in to > avoid developer confusion). > > 5. submit response/response > > The use of an IQ-set here implies that a federation remote is a PubSub > publisher from the federation host's perspective. Does the host accept > publish requests from any remote, or is there some explicit or implicit > agreement to federate? What if a host does not accept publish requests > from a remote? Does it return a forbidden error? > > 6. certificate request/response > > We might want to use http://xmpp.org/extensions/inbox/dna.html or the > Internet-Draft that replaces it (coming soon!). > > 7. documents > > Sorry, I haven't reviewed this section yet. :) > > Peter > > - -- > Peter Saint-Andre > https://stpeter.im/ > > Where is the original thread for this? or where are the texts being discussed above located at? - Joedev --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Wave Protocol" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/wave-protocol?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
