http://www.waveprotocol.org/draft-protocol-specs/draft-protocol-spec
(or at least that's what I'm refering to) On Oct 5, 2:31 am, Joe Developer <[email protected]> wrote: > On Fri, Oct 2, 2009 at 4:48 AM, Peter Saint-Andre <[email protected]>wrote: > > > > > > > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- > > Hash: SHA1 > > > On 7/28/09 1:23 AM, Anthony Baxter wrote: > > > So what comments do people have on v 0.2 of the spec. I agree that the > > > certificate query/push needs to stop using pubsub, and switch to a raw > > > iq set/get/result. Other than that, are there any issues? > > > Here are some comments... > > > 1. wavelets > > > You mention that a user-data wavelet has the user as the only > > participant. Have you thought about instances where the user-data > > wavelet might be changeable by an authorized person such as a personal > > assistant? > > > 2. wavelet name format > > > Perhaps add a note about characters that need to be escaped in XML > > attributes. > > > 3. wavelet update > > > Why use message stanzas here with receipts (XEP-0184)? It seems that you > > really want IQs, and the next version of the pubsub spec will have a > > node configuration option for delivery of pubsub notifications via IQs. > > The use of IQ seems especially appropriate since the entities involved > > are wave servers with stable addresses. > > > 4. history request/response > > > Is the literal NodeID "wavelet" hardcoded? > > > The example for returning the requested history is missing the NodeID > > and ItemIDs (also true for some later examples, let's fill these in to > > avoid developer confusion). > > > 5. submit response/response > > > The use of an IQ-set here implies that a federation remote is a PubSub > > publisher from the federation host's perspective. Does the host accept > > publish requests from any remote, or is there some explicit or implicit > > agreement to federate? What if a host does not accept publish requests > > from a remote? Does it return a forbidden error? > > > 6. certificate request/response > > > We might want to usehttp://xmpp.org/extensions/inbox/dna.htmlor the > > Internet-Draft that replaces it (coming soon!). > > > 7. documents > > > Sorry, I haven't reviewed this section yet. :) > > > Peter > > > - -- > > Peter Saint-Andre > >https://stpeter.im/ > > > Where is the original thread for this? or where are the texts being > > discussed above located at? > - Joedev --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Wave Protocol" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/wave-protocol?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
